this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
1020 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

83529 readers
1680 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
1020
Someone finally did it: a high-end TV with a DisplayPort connection actually is coming this year, including 4K 180Hz support (www.techradar.com)
submitted 1 day ago by commander@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
185 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've got a 43" Aorus 4k gaming screen for my desktop. 144Hz, freesync, 2 HDMI's a DisplayPort and a USBC. There is a 48" OLED as well, but I didn't have the space for it at the time.

After using a 4k 43" for a monitor for a few years, I definitely both recommend it AND wish companies would make 8k ones.

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does anything useful even come in 8K at this point? I saw it as a spec last time I went television shopping, but it seemed like something that wouldn't be useful for another decade.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

8k is effectively dead

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

8K was always a lie. It's impossible to tell the difference from 4K unless you're too close, 4K already has more pixels than your eyes do.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

4k is about 8 million pixels. The human eye has a resolution of about 576 million "pixels" .

I know what you mean with your comment, but the way you expressed it is factually incorrect

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago

Technically, all TVs have more pixels than your eyes do

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

I think it's already the case for 1080p at the distance most people put their TV.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This ad brought to you by the gigabyte marketing division

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Honestly, nah. The screen is awesome, don't get me wrong, but the fact that I had to replace the main board after 1.5yrs, just out of warranty, means I definitely recommend people don't buy it. Luckily I found someone on eBay that dropped theirs, shattered the screen, and sold the internal boards for $50 shipped.

I only brought it up because it fits the requirements and I recommend the format. 4k 43"+ or 8k is goated on desktop.