HistoryArtifacts

768 readers

227 users here now

Just a community for everyone to share artifacts, reconstructions, or replicas for the historically-inclined to admire!

Generally, an artifact should be 100+ years old, but this is a flexible requirement if you find something rare and suitably linked to an era of history, not a strict rule. Anything over 100 is fair game regardless of rarity.

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

Deceptichum@quokk.au

PugJesus@piefed.social

Round shield, silk, wood, and metal, Turkiye, ~1530 AD (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 day ago by PugJesus@piefed.social to c/historyartifacts@piefed.social

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The silk-caught arrow effectively ends up doing damage to the body through its force rather than cutting power

Oh, okay. Just as many modern, bullet-proof armors do.

Thanks for the nice explanations about the shield boss. Smaller shields more suited to individual combat, with larger ones more suited to formational clashes, I surmise.

I still have more pages from The Eagles of Rome saved to share in future. I'll have to take a closer look at their shields when I get to that content.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 3 points 22 hours ago

Thanks for the nice explanations about the shield boss. Smaller shields more suited to individual combat, with larger ones more suited to formational clashes, I surmise.

Usage varies - basically, smaller shields (like this round shield) are usually more mobile, in that you move it around with your hand, attempting to block the enemy's strike directly.

Larger shields (like the knightly kite shield, though not really made for use on foot), you maneuver yourself around. It's more footwork - the shield, being heavy, remains in place; you force the enemy to attack your 'cover' by shifting your stance.