this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
693 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

83449 readers
2933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

False equivalency.

If you were going on a 10 day hike to the most remote location on earth, would you bring the most unreliable device you could find, or something you can count on?

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You don't understand. Their personal device can be trashed immediately without any drawbacks to the mission.

If I go on a 10 day hike to the most remote location on Earth, and bring my yoyo to have some fun with, I really don't care if it breaks on my hike, and the hike is not affected except for my not having fun with my yoyo.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, I do understand. I still think it's a bad decision. It's not just about how critical to the mission it is. It's useful as a form of communication with family and entertainment. In that context I do think it's "important". And also in that context, I would want something reliable.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Absolutely agree. It's still wrong that it's associated with the mission, and it's not "absolutely bonkers" to not really think about the personal email client you use.

[–] kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

It's not like Outlook is their main way of communicating with mission control. If the tablet actually craps the bed, they'll just use another computer. They're nothing if not redundant. Calling a personal tablet mission critical is a false equivalence