this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
203 points (98.6% liked)
Privacy
5480 readers
37 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Talking about the Tempest Attack he mentions, which he tested in other video as well, accessing the camera feed with an antenna capturing electromagnetic emissions, but he was doing it on those wireless cameras so perhaps cabled cameras are safer. I did a quick research here, and if it was analog signal it would be easier, but for HD-over-Coaxial it's more complex because they use multiple bandwidths and each model has different modulation schemes, also they have less leakage so they'd need to be really close to get it, making trying to get access to the feed from inside my property very troublesome.
Unintentionally, having second-rate equipment turned out to be a very secure option lol