this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
275 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
3139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 21 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

They talk about the name in the initial announcement back in 2023 where they link to many blogs discussing the topic.

https://blog.kagi.com/small-web

The term is a bit broader than those protocols and Kagi is far from the first to use it; it certainly isn't a "hijack" as if it was the name if another project or something. 'Small Web' isn't them claiming to own the concept of the small web, or that it's somehow only accessible through them... It's just a feature; search, as a curated product they offer and maintain.

It's just what they named the lens, because it's a lens for the 'small web' as they defined it; like the other lenses. They aren't hijacking the word 'academia' by having an academia lens...

https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/lenses.html#default-lenses

Sure, maybe they could slap 'Kagi' in front of 'Small Web' just to be sure, but I doubt anyone will confuse the concept of noncommercial small websites with a paid service...

Also

In general hijacking of names is one of the dangers very specific to our modern era and not really a problem before the Internet.

Neat fact: you can trace the roots of trademark law back like 7000 years ...

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 4 points 12 hours ago

Because I thought you were obviously wrong about the 7000 years thing, here's a history of trademarks by some guy named Olivier Pierre:

Since ancient times, merchants have been using signs or marks in trade to distinguish their products. Registrations came much later, in the 18th century with the establishment of Intellectual Property Offices.

[...]

The use of trademarks dates back thousands of years, however we can’t date their origins with precision. Some of the earliest forms of identification of marks date from Prehistory. For instance, the Lascaux cave paintings in France show bulls drawings with marks on them. Experts believe that people were using personal marks to claim ownership of livestock, long before literate societies. That was about 15.000 years ago.

The Egyptian masonry from some 6,000 years ago shows distinguishable quarry marks and stonecutters signs, to identify the source of the stone and the laborer who carried out the work to claim their wages. There were creative entrepreneurs who marketed their goods beyond their localities and sometimes over long distances. Wine amphorae marked with seals were found inside the Tomb of the pharaoh Tutankhamun who reigned between 1336 a.c. to 1327 a.c. over ancient Egypt.

I've gotten so used to think of trademarks as registered trademarks, but it makes sense that it has existed much longer in the literal sense. The earliest known law however dates back little more than 4000 years, and there's nothing about trademarks there, so I think it's fair to say trademark law is a lot more modern. :)

Sorry for being entirely off-topic.