News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
If they'd cancelled it, would that be retroactiv? Revoking the citizenship of every US American not of native heritage would be one hell of a move.
Don't be silly. They will only revoke the citizenship of non-white citizens, including native Americans.
Aren't the US usually more of a "letter of the law" type of legislation?
Not since January 2025
What do you mean?
As opposed to "spirit of the law." I'd imagine they'd have a comparatively hard time passing a law literally revoking citizenship for nonwhite Americans.
But passing a law that retroactively revokes citizenship based on birthright and then "accidentally" only applying it to nonwhites might work. So they'd need to be vague enough in the phrasing.
In systems based on the common law, like the one in US, judges can pretty much decide anything. It's typical in US now for the Supreme Court to just say "we now interpret the constitution in a different way" and invent some completely new laws (like they did twice with abortion). So the constitution says that people born in US are citizens and the Supreme Court will say "we now decide it doesn't really mean that, people born in US are not automatically citizens" and then the government will change the laws accordingly. So I imagine they will say that only being born to citizens parents grants you citizenship and everyone born to parents without citizenship will lose their citizenship. The government will then decide what to do with all those people. They can for example declare that anyone born in US before 1900 still is considered citizen and it applies to all their descendants. Anyone born after 1900 who came from European countries automatically gets citizenship but people that immigrated from south America or Africa don't.