this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
224 points (97.1% liked)

News

36942 readers
2467 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

James Broadnax has been locked up in a 6ft-by-10ft cell on death row in Texas for more than 16 years, and in that time he has developed coping mechanisms for passing the long and desolate days.

A favourite technique is to write spoken word poetry at his cell desk. He becomes so engrossed in the creative process that he can lose himself for hours, transfixed in what he calls a “time gap”.

Broadnax is set to enter the execution chamber in Huntsville, Texas, on 30 April. He will be strapped to a gurney and injected with a lethal dose of pentobarbital – his life snuffed out in no small part because of the prosecutorial use, or misuse, of his poetry. In 2009, Broadnax, who is African American, was convicted along with his cousin of murdering two white men, Matthew Butler and Stephen Swan, during a robbery in Garland, Texas. He was found guilty by a jury from which Dallas county prosecutors had initially excluded all Black jurors, until the trial judge stepped in and reinstated one of them.

During the sentencing phase of Broadnax’s capital trial, prosecutors presented the jury with 40 pages of the defendant’s notebooks found in a suitcase after his arrest. The state carefully selected rap lyrics infused with violent images of murder, robbery and drugs, to make the case that Broadnax should be sentenced to death. Its lawyers skirted over lyrics addressing peaceful narratives such as redemption and love. For the ultimate punishment to be secured under Texas law, jurors would have to be persuaded that the defendant posed a threat of “future dangerousness”.

By leaning heavily on rap lyrics and racist dog whistles, Texas prosecutors managed to drown out mitigating evidence that might have spared Broadnax’s life. His defense lawyers emphasised that Broadnax was just 19 when the murders took place. He had endured an abusive childhood at the hands of a grandmother who locked him up in his room without food and frequently beat him. And despite such a traumatic background, he had no previous criminal record other than a single conviction for non-violent marijuana possession.

The jury was clearly less swayed by such details than by the prosecutors’ lurid invocation of the rap lyrics. Jurors asked to see the notebooks twice during their deliberations. Then they sent Broadnax to death row.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It wouldn't be the first time a defendant's writings were used against them. What is the indication that it was about them being 'rap'? They were apparently in the form of free style poetry, not recorded or otherwise set to music.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's in the summary above and the article.

During the sentencing phase of Broadnax’s capital trial, prosecutors presented the jury with 40 pages of the defendant’s notebooks found in a suitcase after his arrest. The state carefully selected rap lyrics infused with violent images of murder, robbery and drugs, to make the case that Broadnax should be sentenced to death. Its lawyers skirted over lyrics addressing peaceful narratives such as redemption and love. For the ultimate punishment to be secured under Texas law, jurors would have to be persuaded that the defendant posed a threat of “future dangerousness”.

By leaning heavily on rap lyrics and racist dog whistles, Texas prosecutors managed to drown out mitigating evidence that might have spared Broadnax’s life. His defense lawyers emphasised that Broadnax was just 19 when the murders took place. He had endured an abusive childhood at the hands of a grandmother who locked him up in his room without food and frequently beat him. And despite such a traumatic background, he had no previous criminal record other than a single conviction for non-violent marijuana possession.

The jury was clearly less swayed by such details than by the prosecutors’ lurid invocation of the rap lyrics. Jurors asked to see the notebooks twice during their deliberations. Then they sent Broadnax to death row.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes, I read that about three times. What is it exactly that makes his writings “rap lyrics“?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why are you so weirdly fixated on the "rap lyrics" part? All songs, including rap songs generally get written down on paper first and plenty of rap songs start out as "poetry" first.

The issue here isnt whether these were rap lyrics or poetry. The issue is that they prosecutor cherry picked artistic works to make the guy seem like some sort of animal that needs to be put to death. They're misrepresenting facts in order to end a person's life.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It being about rap and racism are what the entire article and headline here address. Do I need to quote it for you? "Prosecutors used hip-hop lyrics to help sentence a man to death: ‘This only happens to rap music’". So I am addressing what appears to be the entire topic? I agree, the way the court system works should be the focus, not that the dude is black. But it's not.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In every media source I've read about this the 40 pages are listed as having rap lyrics. Maybe that's how the cops described it, or the prosecutors decided that's what they'd label it to gain the death penalty.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The article initially describes it as "spoken word poetry". I guess the thing is I'd have to see what he wrote and hear their alleged racist tropes to make a determination for myself, not just go with what the journalist alleges.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"id have to be on a confederate plantation myself to know if they were racist" type shit. Embarrassing.

Texas being racist ad legally murdering men of color is nothing new.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I have experienced enough journalism to know to not blindly believe what an article says. "Embarrassing" indeed.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Again, this is really par for the course for texas. But you can head in sand your way around it if you want

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Sure, of course the criminal justice system in Texas is horrendous, and many people there are totally racist. Does that prove the claims in this article? No.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yet it seems the entire basis of your argument hinges on fully believing the prosecution's claim unless given overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Not at all. What I said is that not enough information is provided for me to decide if I agree with the claim that it’s racism related to rap or not. At the same time as apparently the prosecution once people believe that this is a bad dangerous guy, it seems like the author of the article wants me to believe that it’s all because he’s black and his poetry is considered rap for some reason. Like say I was a white guy with long hair and a bunch of piercings and tattoos and I wrote a bunch of death metal lyrics about massacring people. Am I to believe that the jury would not have considered me dangerous? Maybe they’re racist, and they wouldn’t have. I don’t know. Or what if I was a white guy who wrote a bunch of rap about how much I love to kill people or whatever. I can’t really say. Do I trust the Texas justice system or people who live there? No, of course not.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, it's not in that summary. The summary calls them rap lyrics, but only states they came from a notebook. A rhyme on paper is poetry. Nothing in the article makes them truly rap lyrics. Nothing about recording or performing prior to arrest, just that he wanted to be a rapper. Yes, they were very likely it ended to be rap lyrics and were definitely interpreted as rap lyrics by the jury. It's not exactly fair to call them rap lyrics because the article is playing up the racial inequality, but, at the same time, it really is important to highlight the differences on public opinion of poetry.

Though his love of writing has remained constant, the form of Broadnax’s poetry has changed over the years. Today it is spoken word, but as a teenager back in the aughts it was rap. Broadnax’s dream was to become a successful rapper. He would fill entire notebooks with handwritten rap lyrics. Next month, that old habit could cost him his life.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I could rap Emily Bronson. Seems like the media wants it to be "omg black and he's a rapper and rap lyrics". Sure, Texas fucking blows but if you're already in prison for murdering someone, good luck.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A rhyme on paper is poetry.

Are you an expert on writing lyrics? Or poetry? Who decided that you have the last word on how lyrics can become part of a song or part of a poem?

Your arrogance is showing.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Fr poetry doesn't have to rhyme or even have the same amount of syllables - bro probably wasn't even a music student

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, my #1 authority on what constitutes rap or poetry is The Guardian.