this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
1419 points (96.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38991 readers
3971 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lemmy hates billionaires but never hesitates to kneel at the altar of Gaben.

probably has something to do with the fact that he doesn't inject himself into the obliteration of world democracies, doesn't actively supports hate, and he doesn't rape children.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He also has the financial means to solve a lot of serious problems in the world that could save many lives.

But, you know, why spend that money on humanitarian causes when you can just buy a 6th environment-killing superyacht, because the first 5 weren't enough?

There is no such thing as a good billionaire. Gabe Newell is no exception, even if he's less overtly evil than others.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 16 hours ago

Yea, i wouldn’t either after 2025.

No one cares about the environment. If they fucking did $60 random stuffed ugly animal packs wouldn’t be sold the fuck out everywhere. Shein and temu wouldn’t exist.

I’m not even sticking up for him. I just don’t see anyone giving a fuck anywhere but a whole lot of bitching.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

and you know he doesn't have philanthropic activities?

you're absolutely sure about that?

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Philantropic activities do not negate billionaires behaviour. You can't get that rich without things like tax evasion.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago

then fix the tax code so they can't do it anymore.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not about whether or not he has other philanthropic activities.

It's about the fact that he thinks it's okay to spend a billion dollars on just boats.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

well, it's not okay to spend thousands of dollars on OF subscriptions either. so why do you do it?

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm confused. Is this supposed to be your idea of a witty comeback because you took criticism of a billionaire personally, and now just want to belittle others to feel better about yourself?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I take nothing personally from idiotic comments on the internet.

All I was doing was drawing a correlation between how a rich man spends his money and how a poor man spends his money. both spend it just the same except one has more to show for it.

are you jealous of the big yachts rich men have compared to your little dinghy? let me impart some wisdom on you, jealousy is a lubricant to keep you in the pit you find yourself in. don't use it when someone hands you a bottle.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago

just like your mother's snatch, boy.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So because he's nice now we give him the benefit of the doubt? You guys will cry no good billionaires but kiss his ass because you like his platform?

The epitome of give me convenience or give me death

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

IDK what your problem is dude. Just because the guy is rich we should treat him like he's an evil shitlord?

I guess in that same vein of logic it's alright if I start calling you a pedophile because you're probably a while male between the ages of 25-45.

is that alright with you, pedophile?

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 16 hours ago

King pedo is 80 so don’t be ageist now.

[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

(Not the previous poster) The real issue is that pretty much as always when this comes up, nobody is really defending Gaben. But to some people, just pointing out that something isn't quite logical or true, is the same as "giving them the benefit of the doubt", because it's doesn't meet their sky high criteria of negativity for the subject.

The truth doesn't matter to them, but how negative you are about it. If you're not personally crafting the guillotine for Gaben, you are a fanboy. It's frustrating, since I do think we all agree at the end of the day that Gabe should be held to high standards due to his wealth, and he should face incredibly scrutiny if he should tilt.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

agreed. wealth comes with a whole set of responsibilities just like if a person becomes a celebrity.

IMO he's just a dude running a business and as long as he's following the laws and paying his fair share of taxes, I can't ask for more. I can't ask for more because that's all I expect out of myself.

would I like to be as rich as he is? sure! would I be more philanthropic with my wealth? I'd like to think so. I would also do so anonymously, because true charity is faceless and is undeserving of publicity. could be Gabe does something similar.

my point is, I can support him not because I'm a fanboy. I support him because the bar is set so low for wealthy individuals that simply existing without being a power hungry piece of shit pedophile is enough.