News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I mean, that's...not really a negative. You could argue that the content is largely fluff (which I think it is, when it comes to short-form video), or maybe that material that appeals to a user isn't what would help them the most or any number of other things, but being able to find and provide content that is a function of a user's interests is normally something that one would consider desirable. I'd rather do less scrolling past things that I'm not interested in viewing.
You are making the mistake of assuming this is done for your benefit, though. You are not TikTok's customer. You are the product, and advertisers are their customers.
They aren't showing you things you are interested in, they are showing you things their customers are paying to show you.
I can't stand it when my wife says, "people on TikTok all love this product."
Right, because they're being paid to say that.
Hahah that is the worst argument I have ever heard ;)
But in a subtle way to make you think it's what you wanted eh ;)
I found TikTok to have a great algorithm for what I wanted to see. I discovered some quality content there. That said I haven't used it since the buyout and I miss some of the posters in a way, but it's not like they were irreplaceably filling some void in my life.
Yeah, after the initial cleaning up of the algo (tell TikTok you're not interested in whatever you don't want to see) I had nothing but a good experience on there. I, like you, stopped using it once the buy out happened.
What specifically do you miss most? Is it something that loops.video doesn't have?
The algorithm at really good at presenting people who were relevant to my interests. People I wouldn't have any idea I would like. Like Mr. Global for insight into oil markets. Stoobs and Kit Lazer for movie reviews. The autistic stats guy for analyzing truth behind headlines. Some guy for Dr Doom facts and anarchist POV on current events.
Like there were people that if you described them to me, I'd be like... pass. And yet I found them educational and interesting. I don't know how another platform offers that algorithm, even if the other features are great. It's not a knock on anyone else. I have zero interest in YouTube shorts, for example.
That's nothing against loops.video. I might like it if I tried it.
Yeah I guess no algorithm also has a downside, however if you like to see mostly what your friends and people you follow post, it's probably much better.
For the most part that is my preference, but there needs to be some mechanism for discovery. Timeline isn't bad, but I tend to avoid it once I have enough subs. For example, I probably don't visit /all in Lemmy but maybe once a year at this point. I'm sure there are new communities I'd have interest in that I miss. Probably a bunch.
So yeah. It's good to have a good discovery algorithm, but it's also addictive. So it's good not to have an algorithm, but then it gets difficult to hit critical mass for both creators and consumers.
Shrug.
You can make your own algorithm on many Fediverse platforms, by blocking certain words I guess. I personally like the trending/explore pages.
Loops also has starter kits, to make building their own "alghorithm" easier for new users: https://loops.video/starter-kits/browse
https://bradstulberg.substack.com/p/a-new-study-shows-short-form-video
Problem is they abuse that, people trust the algorithm and then they can easily be manipulated I guess ;)