this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
1207 points (96.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38967 readers
5961 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 38 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Do You have any idea what the hosting infrastructure, steam works, and traffic costs?

Also, valve is giving massive contributions to open source from those 30%

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Do You have any idea what the hosting infrastructure, steam works, and traffic costs?

Yeah, not 30% of all PC games. It's how they turn out absurd profit.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Never said that. But what is better for the dev? Using those services or run their own?

And I am fine with Valve making absurd profits, after all, they have put at least 500.000.000 USD into open source (Around 100-200 external oss devs on payroll for projects like Mesa, SDL,...).

Will I leave steam and call valve out if they get toxic? Yes! Are they evil or the enemy right now? To the contrary.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 3 points 16 hours ago

What would be better for the dev is a 9% platform cut and just a slightly smaller megayacht for Gabe.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Using those services or run their own?

If they could have still images and text on the Steam store and a link to their external site for everything else, it'd by far be running their own.

It's the exposure that Steam has an effective monopoly on.

Not everything has to be black and white. I appreciate Steam, but 30% is absurd. They're absolutely raising the price of games and taking money away from developers.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

GOG takes 30%, most publishers take 30 to 50%, apple app store takes 30%, as does Google.

Is this to high? Maybe, I don't publish games. But at least it is not absurd in means of industry standards :(

[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 4 points 16 hours ago

GOG's fee is flexible, as are publisher contracts, which have no relevance to the discussion, as it's in addition to store fees and involves major investments. Google is changing its fee to 20%. Epic's is currently 0%. Microsoft Store's is 12%, itch's is adjustable. In the PC market, Valve is pretty much the main outlier at this point.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

It's the exposure that Steam has an effective monopoly on.

See OP image. It's an effective monopoly because the competition have dumped billions into squandering decades of consumer goodwill.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They help market the game as well on their storefront, and im sure all the analytics around the steam pages for the game.

They could just let you rot in obscurity.

They provide forums and a place for mods to work as well.

They provide chat/friends

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So, Apple and other companies that charge 30% to host apps: BAD

Steam changes 30% to host games: GOOD

I'm not saying this is your argument, necessarily, but it's funny to hear that "30% is good actually!" in the tech space because the last few years it's been "Apple and others who charge 30% are taking too much! All they do is host and manage the traffic for apps!"

And I'm not trying to say Apple is good or anything. It's just funny.

[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So you're not really saying anything at all then. Got it

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 hours ago

Then you need to read better.

They are calling out the hypocrisy of those criticizing Apple but worshiping Valve using the same argument for both.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Valve is one of the most profitable company in the world.

https://www.itidings.com/news/valves-17-billion-revenue-projection-puts-gaming-giant-among-the-worlds-most-profitable-companies/

I mean, just look at this thread and see how much free propaganda they get from gamers. That's a lot of free labour just to defend a billionaire that profits from gambling for kids.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

What exactly is this the answer to?

Yes, they make a shit load of money. But assuming you want to distribute a game directly, how much of would that cost you, and let's ignore the whole visibility shit for a second.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly not that much. The biggest thing Valve brings to the table is advertising and access to customers.

Hosting doesn't cost that much. If you were that desperate for bandwidth (no one is), torrents exist as an option. Blizzard used to have torrents built into their downloader.

The infrastructure is a nice afterthought.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

My day job is designing complex IT platforms.

And the cost goes massive down with size.

So. If your game sells badly, you will most likely spend more. Oney in hosting and distribution then you would make profit.

For example, assume your game has around 50gb. You sell 100 copies of it. You can easily calculate 1-2$ per download.

Add your own personal on top of it, someone has to run that stuff, and licensing and more for statistics tooling and more.

Platforms like valve allow indie devs and small studios to avoid all those costs upfront.

"Not that much" depends on the view

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You can litteraly watch 45gb movie instantly over torrent these days.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Because p2p ... How exactly does this apply to content distribution? Torrents are not always a reliable option....

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There's tons of options to host and share files, torrents are just one.

Steam, like spotify and other platforms is just convenient, and in this era of me, myself and I, it's only thing most people care about.

Anyway, I'm done with the steam fanboys and their cognitive dissonance. Just remember you are directly creating the enshitifcation of gaming, because at the rate studios are firing people, you will soon enjoy only AI stuff, the only way to make profit from games.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

So. Hosting shared files is the same as hosting a game you sell. And want the people to buy it and not just download, some kind of at least activation? Right?