this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
733 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
4508 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I suggest watching the video, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QkC1aK7jfLo but the article has an OK summary.

Also a Mastodon shout-out in the video.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 19 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Give them a few more years and every site except big social media will be flagged as dangerous in your browser, like those without valid SSL certs are now.

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Pushing SSL was probably the last big tech effort/push that actually benefited users. Sure it made self hosting a little harder, and probably consolidated some tracking behind bigger players, but overall end users did benefit.

Most of what I see now is purely for their benefit and users don't benefit.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, rallying against SSL is a weird way to go about it. SSL is one of the biggest and most meaningful changes to come about as a result of the Snowden leaks. The leaks were literally what prompted http to shift towards https instead, because it shined a bright spotlight on how insecure http truly is.

In the short term, it made self-hosting more difficult. But nowadays, with things like nginx and Let’s Encrypt, enabling SSL on your self-hosted site is as simple as selecting a few drop-down boxes, pasting an API key, and automating a cert refresh.

The true “has the potential to gatekeep the entire internet” existential threat is when a company like Meta or Google becomes the authority for things like ID verification or SSO.

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

“has the potential to gatekeep the entire internet”

Add Cloudflare hosting everything to that list.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 3 hours ago

Cloudflare hosting everything

But it's so cheeeeeep! My website (continuously hosted since 1996) used to cost me $15 per month, since I migrated it to Cloudfare they're charging $0.01 ro $0.02 per month for the same hosting services - it's been about 18 months now, I think - I just got last months "bill" - I now owe them $0.25, but they won't charge me until it hits $1.00.

Free service? YOU are the product.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

A big man in the middle attack service, operating in a hostile nation? What could go wrong?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm not rallying against SSL. Just an example of browser warnings.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Wouldn't be surprised in the least.

We're well on our way to being something in between North Korea and Russia. Maybe Hungary would be a good comparison.