this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
276 points (93.7% liked)

World News

55154 readers
3161 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

OK so where is the actual scientific paper?
I don̈́t really care that much about journalistic interpretation, because their knowledge is generally sub par, and their reporting sometimes even decidedly misrepresentative.
I'd much rather read the actual paper. I have even seen papers where the conclusion is contradictory to their own results in their research!!! Which to me indicate a paid for conclusion.

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Go to the guardian article from the OP. Find the link that was in the image I posted. Its pretty close to the top.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

No skin in the argument, I just came to the comments trying to find the study because that link is broken for me. If it's working for you, would you mind linking it here? I can't find the specific one being referenced thru the miasma of google being absolute garbage and it being a recent enough publication that the academic DBs I have access to seemingly don't have that issue yet.

(splash screen at the broken link)

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 1 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago)

The link is now broken for me too. I happened to have it bookmarked after having a very similar conversation about it when it was posted to reddit from gizmodo.

https://academic.oup.com/carcin/article-abstract/47/1/bgag015/8555982?login=false