Trigger Warning: Community contains mostly bad environmental news (not by choice!). Community may also feature stories about animal agriculture and/or meat. Until tagging is available, please be aware and click accordingly.

🪲

Aussie Zone Rules.

Golden rule - be nice. If you wouldn’t say it in front of your ~~grandmother~~ favourite tree, don’t post it.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. You are allowed to denigrate invasive plants or animals.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here. Except invasive plants or animals.
No porn. Except photos of plants. Definitely not animals.
No Ads / Spamming. Except for photos or stories about plants and animals.
Nothing illegal in Australia. Like invasive plants or animals. Exotic microbes and invasive fungi also not welcome.
Make post titles descriptive with no swear words. Comments are a free for all using the above rules as a guide. Fuck invasive plants and animals.

🐝

/c/Aussie Environment acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, sea and waters, of the area that we live and work on across Australia. We acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture and pay our respects to their Elders past and present.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone

zero_gravitas@aussie.zone

Fears for superb fairy-wrens as experts studying Canberra population predict extinction within decades - ABC News (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 18 hours ago by hanrahan@slrpnk.net to c/environment@aussie.zone

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The superb fairy-wren is likely to be extinct within 30-40 years, researchers from the Australian National University have found.

In a new study published in the journal Nature, the research team said the population at the Australian National Botanic Gardens had been studied more closely than most of other species.

What's next?

The team said the only way to spare the species from extinction was to stop climate change.

well, that's then fucked then.

Even in here you get people defending the continued destruction of the biosphere by not stopping burning fossil fuels let alone the complete disregard in the wider world.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes I accepted this 10 years ago when watching who killed the electric car, but people today have more alternatives than ever and had ample opportunities to buy yet

https://www.aaa.asn.au/research-data/electric-vehicle/

and when I see people talking about EV's today they are STILL asking whether spending the money is worth it and trying to work out payback times vs if they get a petrol car, there's no consideration for the environment at all

It's the same reason the electric car never took off to begin with even though we had EV's alongside the earliest petrol cars.

Petrol was simpler better and cheaper, nothing to do with the environment

Usable electric cars appeared during the 1890s. An electric car held the vehicular land speed record until around 1900. In the early 20th century, the high cost, low top speed, and short range of battery electric vehicles left them unable to compete with internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles for consumer use

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_electric_vehicle

[–] 8uurg@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

While EVs have been a thing for a while, historically emissions would not have been a significant consideration: in most places most electricity would still have originated from fossil sources (including coal!). That has only changed with the recent increase in renewables.

For many people the issue is that they can't afford an EV. Sadly those ICE cars are still more common (and oftentimes, cheaper...), and hence easier and cheaper to obtain second hand. With current fuel prices EVs would be a no brainer, but if you can't get or buy one, i.e. due to lack of money, you would be stuck with it.

And maybe: if society punishes those that take action for climate (by making such desirable actions cost money), that may be a problem in itself.

Alternatives to driving (rather than EVs) would be a better solution in any case - pollution by tires is a real thing - but transit access often correlates with higher housing prices, and new housing and public transit developments take a while.

Rather than blaming those that need their car due to society being designed around it, I'd rather blame those that had a hand in designing it this way (and maybe those that choose to drive in a fossil-powered car, despite having money or have exceedingly good access to public transit to where they want to go).