World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
If gulf oil supply was still flowing, that would've probably made a positive difference.
But with gulf oil supply dried up, if he doesn't win the war by blowing it all up, where's the fuel gonna come from for fueling his army, the energy that the European economy needs to supports the war materially and financially? Or the energy fueling China's production of the electronics and motors Ukraine uses for drone producrion.
If Russian oil production is knocked offline while the gulf's is dead, we're entering revolutionary economic conditions and I think the support for Ukraine under such conditions would evaporate.
If russia doesn't want to have their stuff blown up, they can stop at any time by not occupying Ukraine anymore. It's literally their choice.
So you're saying there are two countries in Europe at war, and the defender can't strike back in this war because of another war in middle east that the US started?
Trump only needs to lift Russian oil sanctions at this point to make it clear they're doing everything to save Russia and doom allies.
Didn't he already partially do that? He also appears to be letting Russia (and no one else) through the blockade to sell oil to Cuba.
Or, and hear me out, Trump could stop his temper tantrum he calls a war and then the Strait of Hormuz would be unblocked. Don't make Ukraine responsible for everyone else's mistakes.
I believe he's calling it a special ~~military~~ combat operation
Or alternatively, if he doesn't knock out Russian oil quickly, the US might say, how about we end this war on your behalf as long as you keep the oil flowing. Russia is generally losing currently, but if they get enough funds from oil Ukraine could lose the war (or more likely keep it going much longer).
If they can force the question like that to the US, perhaps. But I don't think they can do that. They would have already done so if they could instead of complain about being asked not to. They don't seem ideologically predisposed to play hardball like Iran is. Or pehaps their material position to knock Russia's oil prod is not as strong. Which is the other concern. If they knock a chunk of it offline, enough to trigger regime changes across Europe (through oilprice-triggered recession/depression), but not enough to win the war, then they'd be absolutely fucked and will def lose the war.
E: In fact now that the gulf is closed, if Zelensky can plausibly threaten he can knock a lot of Russian oil prod offline, that could create leverage he did not have while the gulf was open. He could do even more than threaten the US. He could say to the EU: "Hey pussies, give me all the weapons or I bring the AfD, Le Pen and Farage in power. Actually fuck that, give me air cover too."
Not particularly, that would absolutely backfire if Zelensky tried that. Most of why the war hasn't spiralled seems to be that he hasn't broken any rules of combat, and has decent relationships with most of the countries of the EU. In fact, that would probably give Trump a premise to help Russia, something he has clearly been looking for for a while.
And even then, I think the connotation between Trump and Europe's Far right is enough to make them generally unpopular, given the far right caused the gas/oil shortages in the first place, so I doubt AfD, Le Pen, or Farage would gain enough leverage to parley that into power.
Ultimately, I think Ukraine needs to quickly shut down Russian oil production, as if they don't Russia gets a foothold that makes their war last longer. It won't be particularly popular in a lot of the EU (at least in the short term), but it's better than giving Russia the means to continue their bullshit.
Russia can stop the attacks on their energy infrastructure at any time by withdrawing from Ukraine.