this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
89 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1958 readers
930 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is no more cannibalism than organ donation is, but it's also completely unnecessary.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I get your point in the strict sense, although there's arguably a line of reasoning from some academics who define cannibalism as the consumption of another human in some shape or form, be it literal ingestion or by slavery, and emotional or sexual exploitation, etc. This way, you are taking the aspect or essence of another person, almost to the point of becoming parasitic or opportunistic for your benefit.

And I'm only bringing this up not to contradict you or whatever, but to share this idea that I found quite fascinating when reading The Delectable Negro by Dwight McBride. Like, huh, I never imagined the stretching of a definition could go that far to support a thesis. It's not the most exciting read, but it's interesting nonetheless.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Note that I didn't say it wasn't cannibalism, just that it is as much so as organ donation. Exploitation is kind of the name of the game. Is prostitution any worse than doing physically grueling labor? Is organ donation technically different from cannibalism? Certainly, arguments can be made. They are certainly things to think about.