this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
987 points (92.4% liked)

Political Memes

11499 readers
1281 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So are you for giving more flexibility for people who don't necessarily need it, or for taking away flexibility from people who do?

[–] Zatore@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They're advocating for equal treatment for equal pay. Having kids doesn't make you special.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They're advocating for taking away flexibility. I'm all for giving extra flexibility, but let's be honest, they just want others to not have it

[–] PsycyTuna@feddit.nl -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Having kids doesn’t make you special.

[–] PsycyTuna@feddit.nl -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sorry I should clarify, where did you get the idea that they're advocating for taking away flexibility, and them not wanting others to have flexibility.

Or did you really just base it off just that?

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

thespcicifcocean

So are you for giving more flexibility for people who don’t necessarily need it, or for taking away flexibility from people who do?

Zatore

They’re advocating for equal treatment for equal pay. Having kids doesn’t make you special.

thespcicifcocean

They’re advocating for taking away flexibility. I’m all for giving extra flexibility, but let’s be honest, they just want others to not have it

Just following the conversation honestly. It seems that Zatore is advocating that parents shouldn't get any additional time off because having kids doesn't make them special.

[–] PsycyTuna@feddit.nl -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not at all what follows from that conversation. You're just assuming instead of clarifying or asking.

[–] Zatore@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

You lost the plot

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 0 points 3 days ago

How else would you read that conversation?

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Choosing to not have kids doesn't make you special either.

This is just another way for the ruling class to pit each of us against the other so we're focused more on infighting than overthrowing the bourgeois.

[–] Zatore@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ya, of course choosing to not do something doesn't make you special.

Correct it's class warfare but bringing that up undercuts your first comment.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My first comment was simply a snarky reply to your original comment that having kids doesn't make you special.

You just had to get a dig into parents because reasons I guess.

[–] Zatore@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its called discussion. It's why we have comments at all. Sorry for critiquing your clearly shallow comment

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not sorry for calling out your unnecessary dig at fellow workers.

[–] Zatore@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago

I didn't make a dig at workers

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

This is not a zero sum game.

If we're looking at existing staffing levels, then sure, giving some people flexibility would come at the cost of other people's flexibility. But that premise is exactly the problem here — it's fucked up that when people who aren't parents are in need of flexibility, their employers often say that it's not possible because staffing levels are too low. But this is a problem that arises because employers are cheapskates.