this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
596 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

19700 readers
2061 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Incompetence AND overconfidence, cause those reactors were the latest generation and considered completely safe.

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd sure hope that the latest generation of a technology would be considered safe. That's generally how things work. And then when accidents occur, we learn and make things safer the next time.

As to them considering it completely safe, I'd love to read about that if you have sources. Cause I doubt that they thought it couldn't fail.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 days ago

Oh yes, you'd consider it safe, but you'd probably also be aware of its faults and shortcomings. Now I think I read it years ago in a book about the incident, but even reading the Wikipedia page I think we are both right: some of those working there were not even trained specifically for nuclear reactors, cause part of the technologies were considered state secrets.