this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
657 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

19700 readers
2223 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] realitista@lemmus.org -5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Any scientists want to weigh in here? It's a theory I've heard that does sound plausible even though it's coming from this moron's mouth.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 65 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I'm just here to point out that your stomach microbiome consists of bacteria and fungi, which are not plants. There's also direct evidence glyphosate causes several different types of cancer in animals, which is pretty harmful to animals. Also all life is made up of organic tissue, not just animals.

[–] Jkosmonaut 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In the spirit of the comment we’re replying to - what direct evidence is there? I’ve mostly seen studies providing dubious or weak links between realistic dosages of Glyphosate and any animal harm. I legitimately want to learn more if I’m mistaken.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Jkosmonaut 2 points 2 days ago

A good resource, but it’s indicating that it’s a probable carcinogen, not a known carcinogen. That means that evidence is limited and it’s in the same category as red meat.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 3 days ago

Yes and in that you are correct.

[–] remon@ani.social 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Nah, that sentence is just total non-sense.

Plants are still "organic tissue", the microbiome is mostly in the gut, not the stomach (the stomach is full of acid) and it does NOT consist of plants but of bacteria.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 6 points 3 days ago

I was asking more of whether glyphosphate was responsible for some of the seeming uptake in gut disorders from wheat we see today.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

no nothing comes from his mouth is plausible, he isnt a scientist in epidemiology, or a biologist, he a pseudoscience quack.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes, yes, I get it. We all hate him.

Well since no one else wanted to weigh in I looked it up. It seems there's some correlation in animals but nothing conclusive in humans yet. Glyphosate Exposure Found To Modulate Gut Microbiome Composition

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I believe what he was trying to get at is that the shikimate pathway that glyphosate inhibits is also used in the bacteria and fungi that make up the gut microbiome.

Not sure what his overall point was supposed to be (or whether he had one) but that's the "microbiome is plants" part.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

We are increasingly finding out that gut biome affects mood because the majority of serotonin and dopamine are produced in the gut. While I have to see any conclusive research, I would not be the least surprised to see a direct link between glycophosphate and depression discovered in the future.