this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026

494 points (98.1% liked)

News

36867 readers

2846 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

494

The third No Kings protests are expected to draw millions. Do they need clearer goals? (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 5 days ago by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world

135 comments fedilink hide all child comments

More than 3,100 anti-authoritarian protests are scheduled across the US and at least 15 other countries on Saturday. All these events will take place under a single banner: No Kings.

Formally launched in June to fight back against Trump administration policies, the No Kings movement has grown with astonishing speed – its second and most recent mass protest in October drew an estimated 7 million participants. Organizers expect Saturday’s events to be the biggest protest in American history.

But the movement is also leaderless, broad in cause and hasn’t advanced any policy demands. Some social movements experts recognize No Kings’ momentum but question if it needs clearer goals.

“There’s not any one way to get people into a movement. You want to have as many doors open as possible because you have to reach people wherever they are,” said Hahrie Han, a political scientist at Johns Hopkins University and the co-author of Prisms of the People: Power & Organizing in Twenty-First-Century America. “The bigger challenge is, once they’re there, how do you keep them there, and then how do you channel that engagement in collective ways?”

But organizers say they are aware of such critiques and that these choices are all by design.

“The name No Kings is, in and of itself, a demand. It is a direct repudiation of this administration, of this regime, of its unconstitutional, illegal, immoral and frankly profane actions,” said Hunter Dunn, an organizer with the 50501 movement, one of the groups behind No Kings. “It’s a declaration of intent that we are going to return power back to the people.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

several paragraphs of self righteous soapboxing based on your presumptions about my level of political engagement

Followed by

If you want to ... cry about it

Lol.

If you're not nihilistic about the system at this point you're either a Pollyanna level of naive or nowhere near as informed as you think you are. Whichever it is, wishing that everyone voted exactly the same way you do isn't going to change anything, no matter how passionately you shout into the echo chamber about it.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm plenty cynical about the way things are, but I won't succumb to nihilism and we don't need you spreading it either.

Feel free to call me self-righteous. I don't care, because I know that's projection. My point is "everyone needs to do their part in order to maintain a functioning democracy." Yours is that "everyone should give up because things are already broken."

wishing that everyone voted exactly the same way you

Notice that I never did that. I said everyone need to make informed voting decisions, and I explained the process for how to do that. I even refused to answer your question when you asked me to tell you who to vote for. So you can take that strawman and shove it up your ass.

You're also using the term echo chamber wrong. An echo chamber is an insulated group that all share the same opinion and reflect their own confirmation biases back at each other. That's not what this is. I'm clearly arguing with someone I disagree with, who also disagrees with me. That's not a fucking echo chamber.

But if you want to spread your doomerism and nihility, and discourage any discussion on the topic in spaces of the internet where people still have the freedom to discuss it, then that just convinces me that you're a troll posing as dissent in order to discourage opposition.

[–] leoj@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some of the takes on here are quite unhinged... Thanks for fighting the good fight.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It gets pretty exhausting, especially on some of the threads from after the No Kings protest. It's like all the trolls received their marching orders and emerged from their slumber to astroturf these posts with doomerism.

Thanks for your comment, it's always encouraging to hear I'm not the only one. That's why I won't leave others hanging in similar situations.

Detractors want us to shut up about it, because then we're isolated and powerless. Let's not give them what they want.

[–] leoj@piefed.social 2 points 23 hours ago

I'll always be fighting right here next to you sibbling, and I think the majority of actual people who are living under these circumstances agree.