this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
127 points (98.5% liked)

Linux

13059 readers
240 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Laser@feddit.org 25 points 4 days ago (13 children)

Fish is really a pleasant shell, nothing groundbreaking but it's just nice.

That said, I wouldn't speak of "bash compatibility" just because another symbol/ operator from bash can now be used in fish (this happens sometimes), but this isn't for compatibility but rather so that you don't need to learn the fish equivalent. Fish has a different syntax from bash (e.g. command substitution doesn't use $, no do in for loops...) so they'll never be compatible. There are bash compatible shells out there (I guess zsh, dash and probably oil?), but fish isn't and doesn't try to be.

[โ€“] terabyterex@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

this is my first time hearing of fish and that phrase confused me. its badly worded. i am not a fan of bash so i am excited to try this out.

load more comments (12 replies)