this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
403 points (98.6% liked)

News

36867 readers
2912 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The rate at which the U.S. military has used the Tomahawk missiles in the Iran war has reportedly prompted internal talks about increasing supplies

Some Pentagon officials are concerned about the “alarmingly low” supply of Tomahawk missiles remaining in the U.S. military’s arsenal after firing 850 of the weapons into Iran, according to a report.

The rate at which the U.S. military has used the Tomahawk missiles in President Donald Trump’s war in Iran, now in its fourth week, has prompted internal talks about increasing supplies, according to The Washington Post.

U.S. officials told the newspaper that the number of Tomahawks left in the Middle East was “alarmingly low.” Another official told the outlet that the U.S. supply of Tomahawks was closing in on “Winchester,” military slang that means almost out of ammunition.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] metakrakalaka@lemmychan.org 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

AI says these cost $1.3 million each on the low end.

That's at least another billion dollars wasted on Israel that could've been spent helping Americans.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I cannot imagine there’s actually $1.3M of anything in these missiles. They’re probably a few grand and then about $1.3M of mark-up.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

It's a missile that you can fire from one country and hit a specific building in another country.

Can't just go out and put some Playstation parts and TNT into a tube and call it good. A million+ per missile makes sense.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago

It's not just what's inside them. It's the entire process of making them. There are a lot of people involved that all want to be paid for their work.

Ofc the price you sell them for is higher than the cost of making them. But they're still very expensive to make.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As a former Gov contractor who now works for gov, yes. Price always goes up for government contracts.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yesterday's technology today at tomorrow's prices?

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Yes, and no. It can be great tech but it'll cost an extra 30% on top because Big G is paying.

Also true in government, if you don't spend the entirety of your budget that's been assigned to you, you clearly would never ever need it, so finance will take it away next year when you DID need it. So it's easier to spend the entirety every year just in case you need that amount the next year. It's dumb and annoying even as a government worker.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

There is over a grand of just silver in the things at current spot prices.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

They cost closer to $4m each.