this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
158 points (96.5% liked)
news
808 readers
1095 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The first link does not conclude what you state. From the conclusion, “The exclusion of trans individuals also insults the skill and athleticism of both cis and trans athletes. While sex differences do develop following puberty, many of the sex differences are reduced, if not erased, over time by gender affirming hormone therapy.”
The use of the words many, reduced and over time are all doing some heavy lifting if you want to use that statement to support the comment I replied to.
So, what about the second link?
And to be clear, I was just trying to point out that one link doesn't give a consensus of accepted thought and there appears not to be that consensus.