this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
117 points (97.6% liked)

Memes of Production

1443 readers
753 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Patriarchal society is an expression of capitalist imperialism thus opposition of capitalism and imperialism inherently opposes patriarchy. It's implied. It doesn't need to be said.

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I would argue patriarchy was one of the reasons capitalism was actually able to exist and spread. Plus it also exists in non capitalist societies / contexts.

It’s implied. It doesn’t need to be said.

It definitely has to be said. Manarchists, brocialists and in general chauvinist on the left make it necessary. Because it isnt implied.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago

Check my reply to the other comment, I don't feel like typing it out twice as it applies to both comments.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s much older than that, religion is generally extremely patriarchal and predates capitalism.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 days ago

Yes, religion is another political entity that manifests in patriarchal society. Patriarchal society being an expression of capitalism and imperialism doesn't mean that patriarchal expression cannot come from other sources, only that capitalism and imperialism themselves are inherently patriarchal and thus opposition to them is inherently oppositional to patriarchal society.

It gets deeper into theory that if one isn't in opposition to patriarchy while saying that they oppose capitalism/imperialism is someone who isn't in actuality opposed to those systems as they still support the mechanisms of social interaction (gender norms and all that) that reinforce those systems but that's, like I said, getting into much deeper political theory that I don't have the books on hand to quote from.

It's intersectional. These things all play on each other and it gets complicated.

I'd generalize it a bit more and say that patriarchy is a result of having rulers.