this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
90 points (98.9% liked)

news

808 readers
1095 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

priviziation is not the same as getting rid of.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Privatization would return us to the pre-9/11 days when the TSA didn’t even exist. The problem with the private security back then was that each airport was responsible for contracting out their own security. So you had no standardized training, airports going with the cheapest bidder, etc.

I still remember taking a business trip back in the 90’s, wearing the exact same clothes through two different airports. At one airport I walked through security without a hitch. At the second one I set off the metal detector multiple times. The screener ultimately used a wand and determined it was the metal studs in the jeans I was wearing and also the metal eyelets in my shoes. When I mentioned breezing through security at the first airport he said it wasn’t surprising the different airports had their metal detectors set to different sensitivities.

Privitization can be a good replacement for the TSA, but only if it’s done correctly with proper training, standardization, testing, etc.