396
From F-Droid to emulators, here's who's hit hardest by Android's new verification rules
(www.androidauthority.com)
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Saving you a click:
We have phone manufacturers who offer unlocked boot loaders as a feature, but require two weeks or more of device ownership, registration using personally identifiable info for an online account, and many times don't even allow you to relock the boot loader. Despite all this hassle, these devices still get updated third party OS's with Lineage and eOS.
Anyone who was publishing to FDroid already is not going to ~~be annoyed~~ give up over the 24 hour scare screen for users. The most inconvenient aspect is that they can't use the same signing keys as a Google Play release, which they should never have been doing anyway. Its absurd that developers were using the same signing keys across all different distribution methods in the first place.
EDIT: Phrasing. Everything about Android is annoying.
The APK installation process is already more inconvenient than it should be, and now it will be getting even worse. There should be no difference in installing an APK via Google Play versus any other method.
The fact that the process will still have a 'security' warning each and every time after the 24 hour wait period shows that even for "advanced users" they want to make it as inconvenient as possible while claiming to still be keeping Android open.
You what. All you have to do is download the apk and then run it on the phone. HTF could it be any easier ?
Every APK installation from outside of the Play Store gives an installation warning. It's unnecessary and deliberately trying to make such installations seem less secure in comparison.
A beneficial warning would highlight the many privacy risks in installing apps from the Play Store instead of privacy-respecting alternatives from F-Droid.
Man the custom ROM life just reinforces my idea that stock Android is a fucking nightmare. I use Graphene and it just asks, "Hey, do you want to install this app (+ without network access?" Yes? Neat, it's on your phone now. The literal only roadblock is enabling installs from non-appstore apps like browser or files, which makes sense. No fear mongering, no developer mode, no wait a day to do it.
I agree. I do not want to come off as defending Google here. Things will get worse as they always have, and the sooner we got off Googles corporate platform, the better. Google has no business forcing themselves as a "trusted central source", especially with all the evidence showing that the Play Store is a more common and successful attack vector than third party apks. Third party offerings should be as easy and accessible as Googles.
I guess I'm just really annoyed at the public response because it continues to be doom and gloom; as if open source app development was going to die overnight due to this one change. I'm pointing out that there is already more restrictive things on the Android platform, and big projects still exist despite that. As hostile as a development platform Android has been, a new one time, 24 hour scare screen is likely not going to be the final straw for developers.
I agree, this is not going to be the final straw for most developers, but I, and others, will never use android again after this.
I moved away from Microsoft because I don't need a digital overseer policing my usage of the system. Android is moving in that direction, and so will I move, towards freedom.