364
Man who talked down hospital bomber says would-be attacker asked for a cuddle
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
364 points (99.2% liked)
Not The Onion
21049 readers
693 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
you would be surprised what pediatricians like to do
Crossword puzzles? The Electric Slide? TikTok challenges? Don't leave me hanging.
apparently they like to downvote folk who point out that they rape children
Do you have actual data or are you just typing words online to see yourself talk?
Pediatricians are mandated reporters and are often the ones reporting abuse. I'm very curious about the offending rate.
yeah why would the abusers position themselves as the ones to report the abuse. that makes absolutely no sense. and police officers never commit crimes.
i can get you a saddle for a unicorn while you wait.
So you don't have any data and are just typing words online to see yourself talk.
i see news reports every day of new pediatricians being convicted. go dig them up yourself
Do you mean politicians? I see a lot of those articles. Or maybe pastors?
nope. unlike all y'all, i am capable of spelling and reading.
But not citations, apparently.
because i don't bookmark that shit. why the fuck would i want to?
An internet search should find articles if they're out there. The burden of proof is on the accuser. Why should anyone else go looking for evidence for your claim? I'm open to learning something new, but unless you provide data I'm done with this discussion. Bye.
I mean, I have the wealth of knowledge I do because when I'm suspicious of someone's position I research it myself instead of having a rando spoon feed me wrong or biased information like an LLM.
Plus, I like proving people wrong.
Sure, I do that too, but not every time. And I hate how easy it is to spread misinformation just by making stuff up. The "do your own research" crowd is lazy and destructive. Citing sources should be the bare minimum for dramatic accusations, especially when the person is claiming their knowledge comes from articles in the first place and not personal experience (in which case they should share that as anecdotal evidence) or giving some other reason why a source isn't available. Then we have a starting point for a discussion and further research.
So do your search Coward. This isn't logic class, this is real life and your rules about accusations ain't gonna stop them from raping
I'm just gonna leave this here and move on...
this ain't philosophy class or a courtroom. waving a webpage doesn't stop pediatricians from being pedos