Mildly Interesting

25952 readers

1097 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

Zerlyna@lemmy.world

979

Truthpaste (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 week ago by FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

111 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've never seen labeling like this before. Interesting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Weird kneejerk. What specifically is wrong with their methods of research?

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I'm not talking about their methods. I'm talking about the presentation.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Ah, indeed, that's certainly the correct approach to any scientific info.

[–] ratsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Is it in a serious, reliable publication" is indeed a good first question to ask yourself when trying to determine if something is scientific information or just some rando's personal opinion.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Just to check, you definitely use the same criterion when you read about a dude measuring stuff with a multimeter, right?

load more comments (4 replies)