this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
265 points (94.0% liked)
Fediverse memes
3101 readers
10 users here now
Memes about the Fediverse.
Rules
General
- Be respectful
- Post on topic
- No bigotry or hate speech
- Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
- We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.
- Addendum: Yes we know that you think ml/hexbear/grad are tankies and or .world are a bunch of liberals but it gets old quickly. Try and come up with new material.
- This is not the place to start flamewars between Lemmy, Mbin and Piefed.
Elsewhere in the Fediverse
Other relevant communities:
- !fediverse@lemmy.world
- !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !lemmydrama@lemmy.world
- !fediverselore@lemmy.ca
- !bestofthefediverse@lemmy.ca
- !fedigrow@lemmy.zip
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
NEW USER: "I came to Lemmy because Reddit permabanned me for saying puppies and kittens are cute."
Then I find myself looking at their comment/post history because that doesn't really sound like a normal thing anybody would get banned for. And after seeing what they post/comment here, I think to myself "I disagree with permabanning people, but I think I understand why it might've been done."
Ahahaha, yeah I'm instantly a little suspicious when someone says they got permabanned for "nothing, absolutely nothing!"
I was once permabanned on a couple of subreddits I had never visited before because I had commented on a thread in a sub they apparently didn't like. It was called Kotaku and I had never heard of it before. Just saw a movie thread and commented because I love movies. The thing I hated the most about reddit was the expectation that everybody were as terminally online as the mods were. Not my fault a sub pops up in my feed and I decide to comment on the topic.
Was likewise permabanned from the true childfree subreddit for making a post where I wanted to talk to people about the thoughts and doubts that comes with being childfree. I was going through some things at the time and just wanted to talk to likeminded people. Permabanned for "trolling".
And finally was permabanned for racism on a sub where the topic was the little mermaid remake and I mentioned that I thought Halle Bailey deserved better than to work for Disney. Had followed her and her sister's youtube channel on/off since 2014 and really liked their voices and I didn't want a young artist to be chewed up and spit out by one of the worst entertainment companies ever. I still love her and Chloe's cover of Say Something and think it is better than the original.
So yeah, sometimes you get permabanned for literally no reason or a made up reason. I had no sad feelings when I left reddit. I absolutely hated the mods on most subs. None of them seemed to have lived in the real world for years.
Until you get your IP permabanned site-wide, those are just trivial anecdotes
Just admit you got permabanned for saying we should normalize punching nazis, it's nothing to be ashamed of. It's why we're all here.
Lol I got a temp once for referencing milkshake in a certain context. Advocating violent moo juice
That wasn't site-wide, was it? That doesn't sound like reddit admins, more like subreddit-specific mods.
That was a sub.
That's funny, because I originally wrote "hunting nazis" but revised it to "punching nazis" to make it more palatable to the non-violent. Although either statement would get you banned on reddit...
the only good Nazi is a dead Nazi.
💀
@Gentryfried@feddit.uk, is there something you disagree with my statement?
do you think that Nazi's should live in the same world as the rest of us?
As far as I knew all Nazis have been dead for a long time...if there are living Nazi's, shouldn't they be dead?
I can only hope the downvote was because even dead nazis are bad.
Fwiw, I automatically downvote this childish shit because almost everyone online seems to call anyone they dislike a Nazi.
If you're using pop history's biggest bad guys to refer to everyone with whom you disagree, oknbut you don't also get to claim the moral high ground that comes with punching aforementioned popular history's worst bad guys.
You're just saying you want to punch those with whom you disagree, minus the intellectual justification.
The part where you're wrong is when you assume I'm using "nazi" to refer to anyone I disagree with. Maybe some people do that, and that would be both childish and incorrect. Similar to some people using "communist" the same way.
However, that's not how I use the terms. I have more than a surface-deep level of understanding pertaining to fascism, and I'm capable of recognizing the signs and symptoms. Are you?
Anyone who's been paying attention can see the resurgence of fascism happening plain as day. People openly praising hitler should not be normal. People doing nazi salutes or parading nazi flags should not be normal. Government officials instituting nazi-esque policies, with nazi-style tactics, for professed reasons that are reminiscent of nazi-like worldviews, should not be normal.
Your comment is no different from when tankies get upset when I call them tankies, and they claim that I'm only calling them that because I disagree with them. No, I only call people tankies if they're behaving like tankies. There are specific argumentative styles that distinguish them.
I'm perfectly capable of disagreeing with someone without calling them a nazi or a tankie, if they're not behaving like a nazi or a tankie. If they are, then their behavior needs to be corrected. If they refuse to correct their behavior, then they should be rejected, shunned, and removed from polite society.
Society cannot tolerate intolerance, or else it will become an intolerant society. And the only people arguing otherwise do so only to try to justify their own intolerance.
So it's pretty sus that you come here trying to obfuscate things by claiming it's childish to call out nazism (or if you prefer more generally, for technical accuracy, fascism; although literal neonazis have also made a resurgence).
Watching Andor or some youtuber doesn't count as a significant understanding of fascism.
If you'd actually learned about fascism, you'd know that the Brownshirts and Blackshirts both were itching for street level fights and that the resulting chaos in the streets fueled perceptions of mayhem which helped enable both fascist movements to enact more sweeping laws etc.
The reason trump sent ICE into Democratic cities with smaller immigrant communities was precisely because he was hoping people would be dumb enough to start throwing punches or better/worse yet, kill an officer.
You beat nascent fascism movements by convincing people. You don't win by punching randoms. As my friend had to explain to her young son, "you might be right but the moment you throw a punch, you've lost. Doesn't matter if you're in the right, you've lost."
Honestly, if I were one of the digital overlords of social media and I wanted to help the trump administration, I can think of few things more effective than promoting this idea of punching "nazis". If enough idiots listen and we start throwing serious punches, we'll lose.
If you want to learn, it's a bit of a slog but I can think of few books better than Shirers Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.
That's a pretty big fucking assumption that you're making about me and the background of my knowledge. If you won't take this conversation seriously, then neither will I. Bye.
It's based on what you wrote.
No one who has read anything serious about fascism suggests punching people is anything but helpful to the regime.
You might read Timothy Snyder's "On Tyranny". It's very short and quite well written.
I've read it. I've also read Hannah Arendt, Umberto Eco, and other scholars of fascism.
But if you're just going to assume my criticism of fascism is based on a fiction series made by Disney of all fucking companies, then I'm not going to waste my time discussing these things with you.
When I got banned from reddit for saying we should normalize punching nazis, it was from before this regime took hold, when it was still a foreboding storm cloud on the horizon. It was maybe 2023 or 2024, when an innocent black man was beaten to death by cops, and a photograph circulated of a dude who wore a nazi armband to the man's funeral.
I'm sorry, but if you think the appropriate response to that is anything other than to use physical force to chase him away and teach him never to pull that shit again out of fear for what will happen to him, then I just can't agree with you.
The Allies in WWII didn't defeat the nazis by being nice. I recognize the situation isn't comparable, because there's no coalition of global superpowers capable and willing to depose the current regime in the US, and no ragtag band of rebels has the resources or backing, let alone the organization or the experience, that it would take to stand against the government, and any escalation would spell disaster for the last remnants of hope there are for an electoral offramp from this madness. But that's simply not the context that I was posting in.
Feel free keep handling fascists with kiddie gloves, but that treatment is what enabled them to seize power in the first place. Not because people were treating them too harshly. Neville Chamberlain would like a word...
And you're still comparing where we are now with WWII... And missing the entirety of how these movements get from where we are now to full on authoritarianism. Violence in the streets has been an essential part of fascist regimes. Both the Brownshirts and Blackshirts revelled in the street fights and their political masters used them to point out disorder etc. There's a reason Eco's essay is fourteen ways to look at a Blackshirt.
I dunno, to have seriously read about fascism and advocating throwing punches nowadays is a mind boggling contradiction unless you want more fascism, which I presume is not your goal.
Again, it's why trump has almost exclusively sent ICE to Democratic cities and why DHS was super ready to claim Good and Pretti were domestic terrorists. The trump administration is itching for people to follow your advice so that they can point to violent disorder in the streets and give themselves more powers etc. It's textbook shit.
It's as if someone was talking about how they'd just seen Sound of Music but thought it was weird to make a movie about singing nazis. The pieces are sort of there I guess for that but it takes a wild interpretation to get there. At that point, my first 8 guesses would not be that you've seen the movie. Similarly, if you're advocating things that fascists crave, well, I'm not sure how much of that reading has sunk in?
"Apes don't read philosophy!"
"They do Otto, they just don't understand it."
Edit: a format
You're contradicting yourself in your first two sentences. We don't have to be in full swing WWII/Holocaust conditions to point out when fascism is making a resurgence. It didn't all happen in a day. It took years to build up the the worst of it.
People writing it off now because "It's not as bad as the holocaust" need to realize that even Nazi Germany "wasn't as bad" as the worst of the Holocaust, until it reached the point when it was.
Burying our heads in the sand now and opting for appeasement is not a solution. I'm not saying we should all go out and get in brawls with ICE because that would obviously be pointless suicide, and it would give them the PR that they want.
You're ignoring that this whole conversation started from the part where I referenced something that happened years ago, before the fascists were in power but when they were just starting to feel more comfortable coming out into the open. We should have never let them get that comfortable.
Anyone wearing a fucking nazi armband to the funeral of someone who had just been bludgeoned to death by cops, should have been run out of town at the very least. Better if they had been made a public example out of.
Fascists crave war, but if the Allies didn't give it to them, then we'd all be speaking German! Appeasement is not the answer. Do you suggest that a tolerant society should tolerate intolerance?
That's literally the point.
You deal with nascent/rising fascism through different means than when it is full blown. Public opinion still matters at this stage, unlike when fascism has taken hold.
You even seem to understand that the violence is exactly what they want.
Doxxed, fired, jeered etc. Yes, nazi clad fucks shouldn't be comfortable. But once you throw that punch, you've lost. And the ones wearing the nazi regalia want you to throw that punch. It's the same thing as brawling with ICE, in both cases you are acting exactly how the fascist wants, and arguably requires, you to act.
By throwing those punches, or encouraging others to, you are helping the fascists win.
can you point out where I called anyone a Nazi?
If you feel personally attacked by the statement, I have some bad news for you...
I believe I got perma banned for posting Luigi gifs and guillotines after the UHC guy got euthanized.
The real reason Reddit gave was something about using another account to avoid a ban ... but I only had one account. Reddit was just weird, had to be an AI thing.
I got permabanned from instances because I hurt a snowflake admins feelings by arguing against them.
shit made my day because I was still able to call them idiots, just not on their instance.
I managed to gain one and I have no idea whether I was misunderstood or just managed to meet the worst admin ever.
Basically, it was the recent story about girl guides. Someone asked what the hell transphobes are thinking when pushing for stuff like this.
My reply was 'children are predators'. As in ascribing that thought, in a tongue-in-cheek manner, to transphobes. Banned.
I have no idea if they thought I was seriously suggesting that trans children, or indeed any children, are predators, or if transphobes are now a protected minority. It's the UK, it really could go either way.
But anyway, here I am in my new non-reddit home.
Were you permabanned from Reddit or just banned from a specific subreddit? Those are two entirely different things, and sometimes people don't seem to understand or don't care to admit it.
Sucks to be permabanned from the whole site over that comment if that's what happened, but hopefully you took that as an experience to learn and grow (and not just as a reason to reinforce your discontent with Reddit itself) so that you don't necessarily bring that same energy to other spaces.
Honestly, that's a problem for a lot of ex-Redditors in my strictly subjective opinion. They claim to hate the place, but then bring the same exact energy here. I'm fine with a diversity of opinion and antics, but if I wanted to interact with Redditor behavior, I'd just go to Reddit.
Anyway, I myself LOATHE having to use "/s" to denote when I'm being sarcastic or deploying a bit of mockery/parody. However, I recognize that my intent does not obligate others to abide, nor is my intent and its effect on others guaranteed to align. I would say in the context that you describe, I probably wouldn't make that kind of comment or if I did I would at least do the thing I hate so much and just use a "/s" or sPonGE CAsE, perhaps.
In your new non-reddit home, the bad Reddit-like moderator behavior is alive and thriving here as well. It's not all fairy farts and unicorn blow around here. You probably already knew that, but just in case, figured I'd give you a heads up.