this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
407 points (98.1% liked)

Political Memes

11499 readers
2821 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Iran may have found the move Trump can never play

Original article:
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/03/22/world/iran-war-oil-trump

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

They are fully allowed to close it

According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), ships have a right to transit international straits like the Straight of Hormuz. Article 38 to be exact: https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf

at least on their side of the strait.

And as you say, their side. But it is quite clear that Iran has closed the whole thing, also the part Iran has no right to.

Whether Oman is a party in this war (given their harboring of US bases and military assets) is up to debate.

Has Oman allowed attacks from the bases (I don't actually know)? If not, then Oman is not party to the war. But it seems pretty clear that Iran would not restrain itself in either case, right?

And in any case, this is civilian ships, which are not valid targets even in a war.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)

I dont know. Generally it gets a bit muddy at such a stage. Are they party to the war? Did they expressly forbid USA from using military bases to resupply from/attack Iran? Did Oman cushly stay silent and complicit playing both sides? Are trade ships that are trading with the enemy, not expressly and officially guaranteed by Oman not valid targets in a strait majorly controlled by Iran (even the Oman territorial waters are a bit silly once you take into account the geography)? (Not talking about people, but about infrastructure and supply chain)

If anything, Iran, in its desperation, is fighting well against the superest most bigliest ultra fascist state in the making.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (18 children)

Generally it gets a bit muddy at such a stage.

I think international law is actually pretty clear, in general. You don't get to shoot at every ship that moves.

Are trade ships that are trading with the enemy, not expressly and officially guaranteed by Oman not valid targets

Iran is shooting all the ships. It is pretty clear that "legality" is not a concern Iran has.

If anything, Iran, in its desperation, is fighting well against the superest most bigliest ultra fascist state in the making.

This seems to be the root. You see that Trump/USA is evil here, which it is. And then somehow conclude that Iran must be good, if Iran is fighting against Trump.

Iran is evil too. Fucking evil. Killing innocent civilians deliberately and laughing at it evil.

There is a trend of ignoring how evil some of the Muslim groupings in the Middle East are. That has got to stop. It almost seem like "white man's burden" - as if people think Muslims don't have agency to know right from wrong.

[–] 0x0 2 points 1 week ago

I was about to post an actual reply to this shitpost, but the effort just isnt worth it.

As in the russian special military operation, the invading party is free to just take their ball and go home, but wont because "pride". Womp womp

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)