this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
10 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

2401 readers
291 users here now

Tech related news and discussion. Link to anything, it doesn't need to be a news article.

Let's keep the politics and business side of things to a minimum.

Rules

No memes

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While the minimal effort Epic Games has put into the Epic Games Store (giving away games rather than implementing innovative platform features) shows that their motive is more to keep as much of the money from Fortnite microtransactions as possible rather than be innovative, it doesn't cost platform holders 30% of sales to host game files. It's a highly profitable business model, especially in closed ecosystems where it is intentionally difficult to install games via alternative means.

While I don't like Epic Games, platform gatekeepers shouldn't be able to extract a toll on software distribution purely because they develop the operating system, and especially not one as high as 30%. A competitive app store ecosystem would reduce platform fees as each store seeks to attract developers, who would in turn be incentivized to reduce prices to make their games competitively priced for consumers. For this to be possible, however, alternative App Store installation has to be possible, something Google is trying to make harder and something Apple prevents in most markets (charging an anticompetitive app installation fee in markets where it is forced to compete).

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree with most of that for the most part, but... what about Xbox, PlayStation, and Switch? Should they have to allow sideloading/alternative app stores, too? Or do they get a pass? And if so, where do you draw the line?

The difference used to be that consoles were sold at a loss so they could make it back in the licensing, but that's no longer the case. Today, both game consoles and smartphone are sold at profit. The game consoles are using parts from 2020 (ish, in the case of Switch 2) and they're buying them in bulk AND they've jacked the prices way up. So yeah, they're making money on those, so they should be subject to the same rules as Apple and Google.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

I agree—Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony shouldn't have exclusive distribution rights for their consoles either. Their distribution systems are inherently monopolistic, and all the more problematic when games are on a trend towards becoming digital-only, enabling even greater profits from the eventual inability to buy used games.