this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
110 points (98.2% liked)

Linux

13143 readers
891 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] waitmarks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s not like OpenBSD is exempt from the law. If they aren’t implementing some version of it, they are just hoping no one enforces anything.

[–] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Unlike Linux, OpenBSD is not under US jurisdiction.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Linux is not an operating system, it's just the kernel and has no concept of users/accounts or logging in to anything.

A great many Linux-based distros ("operating systems") are not under US jurisdiction.

[–] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Linux is not an operating system

Please do not start the "GNU/Linux" pedantry now.

many Linux-based distros (“operating systems”) are not under US jurisdiction

Repackaging US software - and Linux-the-kernel and much of Linux-the-userland is, obviously, US software - in Europe does not suddenly make US jurisdiction go away.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you have any reasonable point that invalidates mine?

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you see the difference of kernel maintainers in a particular jurisdiction being subject to their individual national law, however silly it may be, and the Linux kernel and derivates being licensed under GPL?

[–] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

I see that the leaders of kernel development had to remove maintainers for legal reason, because Linux is legally U.S.-based, so U.S. sanctions matter.

Yes, anyone could just fork it. But right now, the only relevant version of Linux is the one that is an U.S. kernel. 🤷‍♂️

[–] waitmarks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It’s still an operating system. Not implementing something is saying “this OS is not to be used in a country / state with age verification laws” Basically baring anyone in california or wherever implements these laws from using the OS in a legal way. I suspect most of these OS’s (even ones that are not “under US jurisdiction”) are going to eventually do something like when you install it asks where you are located and if its in a location where age verification is required it installs the age verification system.

[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds

And finland citizen, dual. So not under us jurisdiction when not in us.

[–] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Then why, you think, did he have to remove U.S.-sanctioned maintainers?

[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Excuse me what the fuck

In https://lwn.net/Article/995186 they say because linux foundation is based in US. Why the fuck they do that? You right linux under us jurisdiction.