this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
379 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

11812 readers
847 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

19% would be the complacent middle class 🤮

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

According to the World Inequality Index, between 1999 and 2024, the top-1% in Canada grew their wealth from 26% to 29%.

In the same period in other countries, the top-1% changed their wealth:

  • in Australia and New Zealand, more or less unchanged at around 23%
  • in Europe, more or less unchanged around 25%
  • in the USA, grew from 31% to 35%
  • in China, grew from 19% to 30%
  • in Russia, grew from 40% to 49%
  • in Latin America, unchanged at around 36%
  • Oceania, grew from 24% to 27%
  • Sub-Saharan Africa, shrank from 38% to 34%

Worldwide, the top-1% share was stable at around 37%.

In the same period 1999-2024, the wealth of the bottom-50% in Canada slightly shrank from 15% to 14%. In other countries:

  • in Australia and New Zealand, more or less unchanged at around 5%
  • in Europe, more or less unchanged around 3%
  • in the USA, grew from 0.6% to 1%
  • in China, shrank from 14% to 6%
  • in Russia, shrank from almost 7% to less than 3%
  • in Latin America, unchanged at 2%
  • Oceania, decreased from 3% to 2%
  • Sub-Saharan Africa, slightly increased from below 2% to 2.1%

Worldwide, the bottom-50% grew their share of the total wealth slightly from 7% to 8%.

Source for the top 1%, here for the bottom 50%.

You can play around in the linked diagrams for other countries and regions.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Geez China. So much for lifting a billion out of poverty.

I mean, conditions have gotten better, but clearly there's gaps.

[–] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is ample evidence that inequality is on the rise in China.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes, and you just posted it. Did you think I was arguing?

[–] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

No, all fine. Sorry if my comment was misleading.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lot of SIMPs for China around Lemmy even for a reasonable critique. Can be hard to tell sometimes

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that's definitely fair.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

yah china lie about its numbers a lot, im beginning to wonder about its population count as well

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

They already did that, now capitalism evolves into its final form as fascism like it always does.