this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
155 points (98.7% liked)
Casual Conversation
3863 readers
321 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible.
- Avoid controversial topics (e.g. politics or societal debates).
- Stay calm: Don’t post angry or to vent or complain. We are a place where everyone can forget about their everyday or not so everyday worries for a moment. Venting, complaining, or posting from a place of anger or resentment doesn't fit the atmosphere we try to foster at all. Feel free to post those on !goodoffmychest@lemmy.world
- Keep it clean and SFW
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
Casual conversation communities:
- !casualuk@feddit.uk
- !casualeurope@piefed.social
- !forumlibre@jlai.lu
- !batepapo@lemmy.eco.br
- !esp@lemm.ee
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@piefed.social
- !television@piefed.social
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Should we accept votes from accounts that never post or comment?
You can give unlimited upvotes but you earn one downvote per post or comment to give to another post or comment (so you can always downvote if you explain).
The bots will find a quiet corner to go jerk themselves off to pump the numbers.
I think votes are a bad idea in general.
Voting seems to have the objective of popular/good rising, the mediocre staying in place, and moving down the “junk”.
Are you suggesting just get rid of voting and replace with nothing or is there something better?
I'm thinking I'd like to try doing without it. The Fediverse isn't so large yet that it's really needed, maybe later when theres' multi-thousand-comment threads like Reddit has.
It only works when it’s small because you’re usually reading all responses on a post anyway. It really didn’t matter what order I read all four responses.
I would expect communities to grow over time if they can evolve in healthy ways. More diversity is usually good but then you’re digging for gold, the good comments, and the work digging was not only part of the fun but it made the find even better.
I think the difference is those were all people talking for the audience. If you and I have a direct conversation and try to avoid our audience, we might realize what made those comment threads better. You watched a conversation between two people and not a performance to be observed.
Then how do we keep these communities just the right size to make it work? To be fair, there are times I’m good with the easy dopamine hit and social media puts the pre-filtered pre voted treasure right there. No effort needed on my side.
It’s like there’s glimpses of the old internet here and there.
Yet the reader is already here.
So, if I understood him correctly, you should upvote the parent comment.
Yes, as I said, the Fediverse isn't so large yet that it's really needed.
You're equating votes on comments on a small Internet discussion forum with votes for the political control of your country? I think you've rather lost your perspective here.