UK Nature and Environment

844 readers

92 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net). Research carried out in the UK that affects the UK as well as elsewhere is acceptable.
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our current banner is a shot of Walberswick marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

GreyShuck@feddit.uk

Kim@feddit.uk

Nearly three-quarters of England’s woods inaccessible to public, study finds (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Nearly three-quarters of England’s woods inaccessible to public, study finds

Exclusive: Campaigners call for government to introduce right-to-roam bill that allows people to walk around their local woodlands Helena Horton Environment reporter Fri 13 Mar 2026 06.00 CET Prefer the Guardian on Google

Nearly three-quarters of England’s woods are off-limits to the public, buried government documents show.

The study by Forest Research, which is a government-funded quango, found that 73% of English woodland is publicly inaccessible.

The research also found that more than a third of the trees on the Woodland Trust’s ancient tree inventory are inaccessible to the public.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Do they need to be accessible to the public?

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes.

I'm guessing you're a yank?

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, I'm British. But as humans we tend to ruin places where we go, even unintentionally. I think it's fine to have a % of woodland that should be left alone.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a world away from being in private hands

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago

I probably should have read the article :D I jumped to the conclusion that the woodlands were just off limits to everyone, but they're being used by private entities.