this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
606 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
4581 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 117 points 2 weeks ago (122 children)

The microinverters stop feeding in if grid goes down. So it's safe.

[–] CMahaff@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Hmmm, I wonder how this would affect things in the future where this is widely used.

I.E. if you had both widespread solar usage and some kind of large blackout, would it be hard to get all your solar back online because it's all in the "waiting for the grid" state? And the grid can't come back at capacity because all the solar it's expecting is out?

I assume people smarter than me have this figured out, but just a random thought if anyone knows more.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 17 points 2 weeks ago

You turn on parts of the grid at a time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_start

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago

Not just solar - most grid-scale generators have this problem. "Black start" is the search term you want to look for, and Practical Engineering has a good video on the subject.

Basically, only a relative few grid generators are actually capable of black starts. The rest need the grid to be already functioning before they can tie in and start producing.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, starting up a downed grid is a difficult problem. Recovering from a large scale failure could take weeks. Longer, with blown transformers.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago

Assuming its not cheap piece of crap that isn't UL listed and that's where the problem is.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What happens when someone makes an unsafe backfeed into a downed grid and then other nearby inverters detect the current and bring themselves back online? Is there a way to detect if the load is being delivered from the utility vs from incorrectly configured solar or generator installations?

Some others are arguing back and forth about this elsewhere in the thread and I see the reasoning: unpermitted systems could accidentally energize isolated portions of the grid during downtime, which might trick properly installed systems to also come back online, and you have a runaway effect where there is enough current present to allow addition safety systems to be fooled.

There isn’t any data transmission over the wires; there either is current, or there isn’t. Arguing over permitting is moot - either safety systems can handle this scenario already, or they can’t.

All paperwork does is slow the relief of dependence on the utility, which hurts their profits.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

The same thing that currently happens when somebody does that with a gas generator? Linepersons get zapped… people get sued… etc…

There isn’t any data transmission over the wires…

That’s very wrong. Not only can you extend Ethernet in your own home using your power outlets, the power companies have been reading meters this way for decades.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (119 replies)