this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
648 points (96.2% liked)

Linux Gaming

25204 readers
31 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

Help:

Launchers/Game Library Managers:

General:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
monolalia@lemmy.world
648
Lutris maintainer: "I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not." (github.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by bdonvr@thelemmy.club to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world
250 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Continued discussion: https://github.com/lutris/lutris/discussions/6530

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Regardless of your opinion on AI, it is not productive or helpful to open this as an issue.

Disagree. It drew attention to the fact that the maintainers of lutris are of questionable character and helped people like me understand that lutris should be avoided completely.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

As the maintainer said, the commits with AI code were already specified. See one here. It was never a secret.

[–] Nonononoki@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He now removed the code authorship from Claude lmao

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hence the past tense. I think it was pretty petty to do this.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was my impression that the AI stuff only started with a relatively recent update

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe, I don't know much about this tool or their practices. I only meant that it was factual that they were mentioning which commits had AI generated code in them.