this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
200 points (91.0% liked)

Opensource

5851 readers
268 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But does the software still work?

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Here's the thing. The more you use AI to generate your code, the less likely you are to fully review all of it, understand what it's doing and be able to fix it when bugs or exploits appear, or even know that they exist. So sure, it might work for now but what about in a couple of years of vibe coding it?

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Then... we only use the versions that work. And someone can fork from there.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 15 points 3 weeks ago

Would have been easier if the original dev(s) continued to work on it themselves, instead of sloppifying the code.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Isnt that just an issue of code reviewing? If your accepting subpar code from AI... you're probably accepting subpar code from humans...

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That is valid, completely.