this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
914 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

83251 readers
4338 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43965516

It is worth noting that both the hardware and software of Fairphone is heavily dependent on a Chinese company T2Mobile.

For those looking to avoid both US and Chinese companies, then the Jolla phone is the way to go.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

the Jolla phone is the way to go

Are there any downsides to this? There has to be, right.

Edit: https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-sept-26

[–] artyom@piefed.social 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean the downsides are it's Linux. That's not without it's upsides but the downsides are huge.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Would a phone have that many downsides? I would think that a computer would have much more. Maybe the phone companies don't play nice? I 100% don't know what the downsides would be.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 25 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

From my research, the phone part of the "phone" doesn't work very well. Which is a pretty big caveat.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I have one. It has no issues with calling, video, ect...

It works in the states as well. And all apps too. I guess my only complaint is parts are getting hard to come by for fairphone 4. Which is why i bought the phone, to be repairable.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 16 points 3 weeks ago

We were discussing Jolla, not fairphone

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago

Oh wait sorry for some reason the interface didnt load the first comment. I dodnt see the context. Woops!

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That’s the main thing you’re buying it for…

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Well, are you? I can’t remember the last conversation I had over phone.

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. Especially with work, although not necessarily with my personal phone, it does happen.

Also, it’s a 650 Euro, £562, device….i don’t want to buy it and some parts don’t work.

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm with you - I'd pay extra for a phone that doesn't take calls just so I can force everyone to just send it as a text.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

could you not just get a data-only SIM?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

Just delete all your phone apps and then you won't get anymore phone calls. Bing bang boom.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm on the phone all day. Believe it or not some people are different from you 🤯

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Goes both ways, I'd be happy if more calls would simply fail midway.

"What a shame, better write an e-mail."

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] aegg@europe.pub 1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Where did you get that from? I have been using one for the past 6 months without any calling issues.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Android is technically doing just fine.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't understand what that's supposed to mean.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That it doesn't have huge downsides.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course it does. Google is increasingly locking down the platform. In 6 months you won't even be able to sideload software anymore without Google's permission.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You are confusing few things here. You said that Linux (not Android) has huge downsides. I mentioned that Android does not have such huge technical issues and is technically doing just fine. Now you talk politics, not technicalities and these don't have anything to do with Linux or its downsides. My point is that Android proves that Linux on mobile does not have huge downsides, at least from technical POV. Also there is AOSP that is not affected by politics. Until Google decides to make it closed source that is.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I honestly have no idea what you're on about. I didn't say literally anything about politics.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Google disabling sideloading is not a huge linux problem, but ~~at~~ is something steaming from how Google handles it. But keep going on with how linux has huge downsides...

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Google disabling sideloading is not a huge linux problem

Why would anyone think that it was? Are you just doing the whole ignorant and annoying ACKCHUALLY "Android is Linux" thing?

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I give up, linux has huge downsides but the linux os by the name android seemingly doesn't but linux has huge downsides you can't even list. OK, got it.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh Jesus. You really are. I have to say the thing again: Anyone who says "Linux" while not explicitly referring to Android or the kernel itself means GNU/Linux and your obtuse pedantry is not contributing anything to the conversation.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm Jesus now?

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Are there any downsides to this? There has to be, right.

SailfishOS userland is proprietary software. AOSP is more open than SailfishOS. The Android compatibility layer of SailfishOS is based on AOSP, so the stack to get the most important 3rd party apps working relies as much on AOSP as any Android ROM.

Upside of SailfishOS: There is a decent chance that the upcoming Linux ARM version of Steam + Proton will run directly on that device.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

SailfishOS userland is proprietary software

I don't see it really as a downside compared to Android, since no OEM is running clean AOSP.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t see it really as a downside compared to Android, since no OEM is running clean AOSP.

This article is about Fairphone with /e/OS, not some other OEM with a proprietary Android variant.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Then you are off-topic as well.
/e/OS is based on LineageOS. AOSP alone has very little "userland" still actively maintained.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Then you are off-topic as well.

No. Pelespirit asked about Jolla which is mentioned in the ~~article~~ posts's text body. I gave context for Jolla's Android compatibility. It's 100% on topic.

/e/OS is based on LineageOS.

And: "The Android compatibility layer of SailfishOS is based on AOSP, so the stack to get the most important 3rd party apps working relies as much on AOSP as any Android ROM."

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

I think I bought one, but I'm not sure. I might have been very drunk back then.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

On the first one there were limitations on the android emulation stack. Not sure how they managed afterwards on later OS releases or how it will go with newer ones.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

There will always be limitations unless massive changes occur such as Google open sourcing their Play Services as part of AOSP. MicroG has limited resources to implement compatibility.