Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
What do you mean by being spiritual? I'm an idealist so I think consciousness/subjective perception is the fundamental substrate of reality, and matter/the physical world is just an illusion, but I wouldn't consider myself spiritual...
That's actually the basis for Mahayana, which then transformed into multiple kinds of Buddhism. I'd consider it a pretty spiritual stance, if not only because it means that you've spent time thinking about what is "reality" and our role within it.
Not at all to imply that this is your case, but there's a difference between having an intellectual understanding of idealism and actually having the lived experience of it.
And most people need to do some kind of practices to get there, which are typically found in spiritual contexts (meditation etc.). But there definitely are people who just kinda drop into it.
Though... yes. It's a philosophical stance but it kinda gets tossed under the umbrella of spirituality. Maybe that's actually a problem come to think of it. Since spirituality is easier to dismiss as "woo" (as in, everything that goes against the almighty scientism is woo...)
Though you do say:
What do you mean? Because as an idealist, I was specifically taught to see the difference between a subjective perception and general consciousness. It's very possible this is just semantics of course.
Cool, do you think the belief in physical reality can be harmful?
I think you have to operate in the framework of the sensory world when acting within the sensory world, and like using science and stuff to work out what's likely to happen if you do certain things as opposed to other things. But that's not the same as saying that you believe the physical world is real
I think we should use science to manipulate our senses for good, regardless of alignment with reality. But the realists say we should only use science to get closer to reality. I think they're stifling scientific progress.