this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
458 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21063 readers
1164 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

North Carolina’s Michael Phillips revealed that he had a 0.38in member in bid to reduce stigma of the condition

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Adding one more person adds more than one comparison. Assuming birthdays are evenly distributed (they aren't), 2 people have a 1/365.25 chance of sharing a birthday. But adding a third person adds 2 more chances. Adding that 23rd person adds 22 more chances than adding the 22nd person. 1+2+3...+22=253 separate checks, of which only one needs to match.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So does this apply to the problem: 0.6% of people have micropenis. How many friends do you need to have before you’ll know someone?

It doesn’t seem to, because there isn’t any element of comparing them between each other. It’s just a straight percentage chance.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe is you ask the question like this:

If a person with a micropenis is in a room, how many men are needed in that room to have a 50% chance of someone else in there also with a micropenis? And how many women in that room are needed for a 50% chance a woman has a bigger clitoris than that person's micropenis?

Or:

How many men in a room are needed to have a 50% chance someone else has the same penis size?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah that would turn it into more of a birthday problem.

It would also make it downright weird.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

It would also make it downright weird.

So you mean a room full of men talking about their size, or a full scale measuring contest?

Both would be fucking weird though xD

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No I was making a joke and everyone decided they were gonna do a full autism about it

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ok boomer, maybe it's time for a little nap. What's wrong with my autism?

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think the point is not how quickly can someone Google it but can he actually explain it, because he brought it up in a situation where it doesn’t apply, meaning he doesn’t actually understand it (ie can’t explain it).

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Canconda’s original comment did not have the wiki link which is why I replied. Honestly, dropping 23 possible birthday pairs to reach >50% probability is still not intuitive to me.

Of my OG friend group of ~12 there are two matching birthday pairs. One coincidental and one pair of twins which don’t count.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

To grasp it intuitively, I think of it like this.

With the first person, you have 1/365 chance the birthday will be on any given day.

Each person you add to that adds not just another person but also another day that can be a match.

After two people, you still don’t have a match but now you have two days. The third person can match either of those. That’s a lower bar than person #2 had to meet.

By the time the 15th person walks in, the question is: “what are the odds that you share any of these 15 days as your birthday.” And remember, it’s not that that person’s odds are 50%. It’s everything from the original 1/365 chance on up to that fifteenth person, cumulatively, that has a 50% change of a hit.

See how this already sounds a little more likely than just narrowing in on the final final result of two people having the same birthday? The way the problem is phrased makes it sounds like more of a bullseye than it truly is.

So I think part of it is just difficult to grasp intuitively, but it’s also phrased deliberately to throw off your intuition.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I can see it kinda. At the same time you are reducing the unique dates and increasing the people you could match with.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can't because probability is bullshit lol.

Damn you guys have no sense of humour.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If that was your idea of a joke, I’m afraid you have no idea what’s funny. More likely you are just attempting to laugh off your embarrassment.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Buddy if you tell jokes to make other people laugh... sorry that sucks. Wouldn't' wish that on my worst enemy.

I'm lmao and y'all are shitting bricks about math

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You suck at math and we are lmao at your attempts to hide it.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

THATS THE JOKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

you daft ass mf

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Chill, bro, I’m just joking!