It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia

bro, you have not gotten an answer because every vegan is tired of that question.

Kek, no. It's because veganism is not rational when you take it far enough.

No, they're not answered and you haven't answered either. So is it okay to use the wool that you get from sheep when you only care for the animal and not for the products you get from it?

You're pretending the world is black-and-white and it's hilarious.

You can't answer the hunting question either. You'd just argue it's unnecessary brutality. But if the deer population isn't kept in check by the hunters, both animals and humans would endure more suffering. So if you're against animal and human suffering, you have to be pro-population control of those animals. Because without, deer crashes with cars would increase, harming both animal and human, and overpopulation of deer would literally destroy the environment in which they live for all animals.

But the answers I've gotten from vegans include for instance releasing wolves into population centers in areas which haven't had wolves for hundreds if not thousands of years. As if the wolves would 1) have an understanding of the amount of deer they need to cull or 2) would somehow kill the deer more humanely than a one-shot kill from a .308?

Go on, show me you bingo-card, I'm itching to see what it says.