this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
102 points (94.7% liked)

Neo-Luddites

63 readers
5 users here now

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GorGor@startrek.website 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“More fundamentally, AI models may not understand ‘stakes’ as humans perceive them.”

lol, yathink?

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AIs don't "understand" anything - they're just pattern-matching routines on a ridiculous amount of steroids and a random small amount of hallucinogens added in for "creative purposes." The only intelligence behind them are the humans setting the guard rails for them.

[–] StopTech@lemmy.today -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This depends on the definition of understanding. If by understanding you mean mental processing then obviously AI can never do that because it has no mind, it only simulates the behaviors of a mind. But if instead understanding is understood (pun intended) to mean the process of extracting accurate information from something and responding to it in a rational way, then yes AIs do understand lots of things.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's the first time I've seen someone say that regular expressions are intelligent because they "understand" patterns.

[–] StopTech@lemmy.today -1 points 1 month ago

People do talk about writing things that "the compiler can understand" so it's nothing new. Also I think you meant to say regular expressions understand strings, not patterns - or that regular expression engines understand patterns.