this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
69 points (100.0% liked)
World News
1964 readers
535 users here now
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities:
Rules
Be excellent to each other
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes but what im asking is why does the west get blamed for Pakistan bombing Afghanistan when:
We are 5 steps away before we reach the West, yet the West is blamed.
Saying the west "gave" back power to the Taliban is saying like Ukraine gave back Crimea to the Russians.
If you truly want to say the west gave power to the Taliban we would need to go further back.
That's 12 steps away before the West causing this. outside of 5, were the West lost the war if you want to blame them for that.
If any of these things acted different this wouldn't have happend.
Why is it only the West that is mentioned?
If Afghanistan wasn't a Taliban regime it would be a war of Pakistan and Afghanistan vs Taliban. No Kabul bombing.
And if Pakistan didn't send planes then there would be no Kabul bombing.
If the Pakistani Taliban didn't attack Pakisfan there would be no Kabul Bombing.
If the Taliban didn't support the Pakistani Taliban there would be no Kabul bombing.
The west fought the Taliban for 20 years, how long should they have fought on? 30? 50?
A good place to start is "if the CIA hadn't financed the Taliban..."