218
There's No "Progressive Foreign Policy" Without a Reckoning for Dems Who Supported Genocide
(theintercept.com)
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
218 points (91.6% liked)
politics
29219 readers
2185 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The reason people don't like that question, is it's a "divide and conquer" approach. However most people repeating it, don't understand.
For social change, it needs a large movement. To get a large movement, everyone has to handle one task at a time, then move to the next.
Like, if you were in a hotdog eating contest, would you eat one hotdog at a time so your score goes up?
Or would you take a bite out of every hotdog in front of you?
One way you keep steadily increasing score and making progress, the other you might eat 50 half hotdogs and lose to a guy who ate 5.
So why would anyone argue against the strategy where even if everything isn't finished by the buzzer, we still made some progress?
You are already a victim of divide and conquer. Anyone has to understand that a 3rd Trump term or even a full 2nd term with house, senate and presidency will be disastrous.
If you do not vote this election you might never be able to vote again. This is what they are banking on. They want more time to disenfranchise even more people, they want to bar as many people as they can from voting.
You are hiding behind the bodies of Palestinians. You will not 'solve' this problem in one election cycle. This will take generations. Especially with the damage done by billionaires in the past 10 years.
The First step needs to be, getting as many Dems in power as possible. After that, continuing to demonstrate, tell people in power that you are still not happy with the country. Then you can let people like AOC use that momentum to bring institutional change to the supreme court, the senate- and house electoral maps, the 2 party system, citizens united, etc.
What is wrong with the USA goes so much further and deeper than Gaza.
The people who won't vote aren't hanging out on political message boards bud...
The thing is, you don't have to be very politically active to not like genocide. It's a very low bar, and that's all that matters:
Running a candidate voters want to vote for.
Spend less time trying to sway millions of voters, and focus on getting a candidate they'd vote for into the general. That's the entire point of a primary
the first step needs to be voters telling candidates they cant win if they support genocide. Anything else will lose.