this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
106 points (99.1% liked)

Space

2336 readers
66 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.

Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ZafiraHUN@mander.xyz
otter@lemmy.ca
Bitswap@lemmy.world
otter@mander.xyz
106
Hubble could re-enter atmosphere as early as 2028 (www.theregister.com)
submitted 1 month ago by cm0002 to c/space@mander.xyz
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A newly released plot of the Hubble Space Telescope's altitude shows just how quickly the observatory has descended in recent years.

The post on Bluesky by astronomer Jonathan McDowell is a stark reminder that Hubble is heading back to Earth, possibly sooner than previously thought, as its orbit decays.

Hubble was launched into low Earth orbit in 1990, carried in the payload bay of Space Shuttle Discovery. While it remains capable of pointing its instruments and has returned breathtaking imagery over more than three decades in orbit, it cannot raise its altitude.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, I know. That sounds to me like they were trying to accomplish the boost without equipment designed for the task. I agree that a damage risk is better than of burning up, but they also thought they would have more time. They had forecast deorbit in the mid 2030s I think.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The only equipment designed for the task was the Shuttle. Hubble was designed and built for the Shuttle's service bay. So we haven't had equipment "designed" for this task since the Shuttle was decommissioned in 2011.

The whole point of the research in 2022 was to see about designing new equipment that would work with Dragon.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that's basically what I said above. Designing a shuttle replacement is a huge task. I can't imagine a dragon capsule will be easy to build out to perform the same functions. It's unfortunate that all the attempts to build a shuttle replacement have failed.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

if it's any consolation, in the al gore wins 2000 timeline they're on Super Shuttle, the next generation of SSTs, and multiple Hubbles now orbit.

Along with a moon base and a stable climate.