this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
512 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29300 readers
2373 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

People are still confused or dismissive whenever I try to explain why I try to vote for character quality over party or policy. sigh

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

character can be faked compared to a voting record though. I get what you mean but there is party in the us where just being in it makes the persons character questionable at best. So over party and policy only applies to me if there of reasonable party or policy. If republicans were like they were with teddy roosevelt or lincoln things would be different.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well yeah, and that's where things get interesting. Looking at their policy and voting history certainly does matter, and in fact it often is the best way to determine their character.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

yeah voting record is top for me, then money, then its how they present themselves and such. ugh. aweful primary this go round with a senate seat as we have a lead canidate I clearly don't want and a dark horse I very much do want but there is a third canidate I would not like as much as the darkhorse but very much over the leader and she is close to him in polling. So im stuck with the do I vote for who I want the most or vote for my second choice to avoid the one I don't want. I wish I lived in a the area with the write in guy. Well the irish sounding guy as there is also a spanish sounding one but the irish sounding one was in the bovino commercial with his hands down his pants waggling his figer through his zipper. I so want him running against the republican in the general.

[–] Dlayknee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

What's absolutely wild is that lots of people voted for this guy bc they firmly believed he was the moral high-ground as opposed to those scary devil-loving democrats. It's mind-boggling...

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I mean you're right, but also Lieu is a democrat which is already the party that his voters are more likely to vote for.