this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
279 points (96.3% liked)

196

5738 readers
1388 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I'd say it's not inherently unethical. How else would you find out about options for a thing you need?

How current the ad industry works however, can die in a fire.

[–] LordPassionFruit@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I walk to the store, I check what's there, I ask an employee for help, then make my own decision. If it's shit, I don't get it again and tell who I know to avoid it. I don't get products that people I trust have had bas experiences with.

Advertisements are lying. Every dollar spent on marketing is a dollar that could have been spent either improving your product or paying your staff. If you advertise to me, I will actively avoid your product.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

You walk to what store? How do you know the store exists? How do you know what the store sells? What if you live in a small town that doesn't have a store that sells the required thing? How do you know where to drive to to? All this basic information about the store itself is coming from advertising. It's not just about popups annoying you online.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

When I moved to my current town, the first thing I did was figure out where all the grocery stores, the post office, and the library are. Do you really rely on advertising to tell you what to do? You can just see grocery store and say, "Yes, they probably sell cheese" and then go in?

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Ok, what store do you go to in your town for specialized tools to fix your car?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

It sounds like you're considering the sign above a store to be an advertisement.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

It is. Why do you think store logos aren't just a plain text sign on the door? That would be far cheaper for the store to do.

[–] TheYojimbo@lemmy.world 30 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

You can just search for it, you don't need ads for that. Ads is a really bad way to find out about options, because it's never about quality, it's all about appearance.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

How would you know what to search for? Some advertising is fine - a sign for a restaurant or industry mailers or magazines, "related products", etc etc are all very tame forms of advertising. The problem is hyperintrusive advertising which has now spiraled so far into hell that it drives a model of data harvesting and content slop that's slowly tainting all access to information we have.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How would you know what to search for?

Because of the needs I have, when I am hungry ill search for recipes or restaurants. When my apartment needs cleaning ill search for cleaning supplies, when I am bored ill look up what movies are playing.

I actually can not come up with a single situation where advertisement would be needed or helpful in anyway. I also do not have a problem with smaller advertisement, but in my dreams they are all banned regardless. Won't be missing those.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Okay, to break down the point: search for them where?

[–] vogi@piefed.social 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I guess on the internet or in the store.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

So how do people get on the internet or in the store? Heck, how do you know that the store exists in the first place (and if the store doesn't have what you need, what do you do?)

I'm just after a middle ground - the current insanity of advertising is obviously too much, but the idea of doing away with it entirely isn't feasible either. Burning all the advertising execs at the stake might be a good place to start in terms of reforming things...

[–] vogi@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago

Normally I look stores up using OSM and I believe I found my ISP through an comparison portal. Sure there could be advertisement involved and I definitely bought many things because of it. I just don't think we would need that in any way and that the quality of life would even go up if we banned all advertisement.

Its definitely not feasible, at least not in our life times. In my city there was a citizen initiative to ban a lot of public advertisements which did not went through as there were not enough people signing up. So apparently we are not ready for that yet. Burning all the advertising execs does sound like a sensible thing to do though :) Lets settle on that.

[–] Delilah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Do you not have friends? Word of mouth recommendations exist.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Relevant XKCD:

The value of word of mouth advertising is the reason we have to deal with the hell that is astroturfing ad campaigns.

[–] Delilah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Not all word of mouth is advertising. While word mouth advertising is powerful, that argument is still just a straw man.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

This seems like it's not going to be a productive conversation if you're going to accuse me of using a strawman argument.

All word of mouth advertising is advertising. You're advertising that you like something to your friends. That it's viewed as "not advertising" by so many is the reason it's so valuable, and why so much effort is being expended to manufacture and subvert it, since it's one of the last forms left people aren't super conscious of. "Telling other people about the thing" is the oldest and most basic form of advertising, but it's still advertising, and people have worked to exploit it since the earliest records we have. Hell, even Ea Nasir advertised via word-of-mouth.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

This seems like it’s not going to be a productive conversation if you’re going to accuse me of using a strawman argument.

It seems like its not going to go anywhere because you think of all human communication as an act of manipulation.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Not all advertising is manipulation. The convo is going nowhere because you are No True Scotsmanning the definition of "advertisement".

If you're dropping a name of a product or service and describe anything about it to appeal to others, you are definitionally advertising.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

... Run that one by me again? What??

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I see what you're saying, but the obvious distinction here is that if someone is actively searching e.g. Google for a product, they don't mind being shown products (and by extension being advertised to) - they're actively seeking it out. What everyone has a problem with is being shown advertisements for products when they aren't seeking them out and in fact actively want to avoid them.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Thank you! The unending intrusiveness of modern advertising really has killed and buried the useful parts of advertising by becoming the norm, I wholeheartedly agree.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

In the ancient days we had a thing called the yellow pages.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago

Just FYI, any entry in the Yellow Pages other than the plain text, non-bold, name+phone number format entries were also paid for advertisements.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yeah, exactly!

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

The search results are ads. If I'm looking to buy a table, those don't inherently come with a webpage. The website in its entirety is an ad.