this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
592 points (100.0% liked)

News

35962 readers
3107 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43334510

The Department of Justice spoke four separate times to a woman who credibly accused Donald Trump of having sex with a minor he met through Jeffrey Epstein—but most accusations against the president appear to have been removed from the government’s documents on the alleged sex trafficker. 

21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens. When the woman bit down on Trump’s exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.

Yet last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi insisted that there was “no evidence” that Trump had committed any crime—adding to the growing pile of denials from Trump officials that constitute a sweeping cover-up of the president’s alleged wrongdoing. 

Justice Department records indicate that the FBI spoke to this woman not once but at least four separate times, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. Now those records appear to have been removed from public viewing—despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires all documents relating to the alleged sex trafficker to be made public. 

Sollenberger discovered a record of four separate interviews, which took place in the summer of 2019, in a separate database of documents downloaded from the government’s public files on Epstein. That document indicated that the first of the four interviews was conducted on July 24, 2019, and the last conducted on October 16, 2019. That document was given to Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers as part of her trial, though the specific allegations predated Maxwell’s involvement with Epstein, Sollenberger wrote.

The woman’s first interview was entered into the FBI’s case files on August 9, 2019, just one day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell. FBI agents typically have a deadline of five working days to file interview write-ups, indicating an abnormal 16-day gap, Sollenberger noted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 164 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Who wrote this shit, "...Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens.." so a teenager or child and not a woman then?

[–] Daviino@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

Always the same language. Same deal with underaged black versus white kids. One is called a young man, the other a kid. Guess who is who.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 101 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

US media keeps calling the children in the Epstein files women for some reason. It’s been an ongoing theme. German speaking media will occasionally use the German word for minor, but they often also just lazily translate from US sources and use the German word for women/woman.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 59 points 18 hours ago

It's called sane washing. The US media is owned by people who are likely in the files too.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

We need to have a simple check in the government and media. Everyone who thinks a 13 year old is a woman please stand on this side of the room. Everyone else please leave the room. Then we drone strike the room with the earthquake bomb.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The 13 year ol side of the room opens up into a pungee pit and they all fall inside and have to slowly bleed out.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Into a gaint woodchipper running at 1/4th the speed?

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Actually ome of those metal shredders works better.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 minutes ago

I used to run the wood chipper in an old saw mill in Ontario. It would take an 8' log 15" in diameter and chip it before you could say one-one thou ...

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 34 points 17 hours ago

Yes. The allegation should be phrased that he beat and raped a child.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

She's a woman now, and was when the interviews occurred over 30 years after the sexual assaults.

The woman was sexually assaulted when she was in her early teens.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Loterally says "Forced a woman"

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think the intended meaning is that she was a woman when the allegations were made but the (alleged) events took place when she was in her early teens.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

I know we're all programmed to give people the benefit of the doubt. To try to find sense in any situation. To use Hanlon's razor.

When it comes to Trump, please stop. He doesn't deserve this excess of leniency. He's a child rapist and murderer running the country. Do not try to find sense when there is nothing but cruelty and abuse. It makes a lot more sense when confronted by evidence of cruelty and malice at such a staggering scale to use a reverse Hanlon's razor with Trump.

They're called women to purposefully obfuscate the fact Trump beat and raped a little girl. One of many.