this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
110 points (98.2% liked)
New York Times gift articles
1594 readers
214 users here now
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

I highly doubt he doesn't have any evidence on others...
This is how these rings should be treated.
If you got enough to take one down, do it. And pressure them to snitch as much as possible.
Then get the next, and keep going cleaning out everyone you can.
What was happening is they'd find a monster, pressure for info, then let them continue as intelligence assets.
And it just continued to grow until so many powerful people were in on it as "informants" that it was essentially state condoned. If everyone is "informing" and no one is getting prosecuted, then it's actively harmful.
Ex-prince Andrew being prosecuted by his own government is huge. And likely to result in a lot more prosecutions in addition to him being held accountable.
Quick edit:
It's like Elvis getting a DEA badge so he could fly with drugs and guns.
It's legal and technically he's supposed to fighting crime, but he just got rubber stamped on some paperwork so he could flagrantly break the law.
There's a non zero chance part of Epstein's services included getting people designated as informants to avoid prosecution. Then they really could get away with anything.
Andrew doesn't seem very smart, so they'd have a pretty good chance of tripping him up in questioning and getting him to incriminate others. But he has been arrested for handing over sensitive information (basically spying, or being a useful idiot for spies), so the questioning may not be about other things that went on with Epstein.
I highly doubt that if he has any evidence that he'd blab.
He's seen what happened to Epstein