this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
235 points (99.2% liked)

PC Gaming

14361 readers
1100 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

They should close PRs to the public and only accept then from contributors who apply to be vetted.

It sucks, but that's really the only good way to prevent spam.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] addie@feddit.uk 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

AI is quite good at solving captchas; better than many humans. And it doesn't really slow down the sloppers for them to set their machine running, come back in an hour and then solve a puzzle manually to submit it. Couple of minutes of work every day and they can still drown the world in bullshit.

Something needs to change, but I'm not convinced that would be enough...

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Captchas were litterally designed to trained object detection AI.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 1 month ago

Which AI poisoned captchas?
'cause hallucinogenic ones seem pretty effective deterrent.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

This Is what i dont understand. Can't you just say 'no' and keep your own version? Are they stupid?